lol this thread's still going? i been gone 8 hours just got off work was here earlier today. killzone2 isnt realistic take it from me person who was shooting guns before i started playing wolfenstein 3d in 1992.
LOL im not talking to myself im here to post a message any whoever reads it, then well im not talking to myself they dont have to reply other people see what im saying, that's good they dont reply. nice self ownage. the people here arent cool enough to have conversation with
[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="gamewatereddown"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] I disagree completely troll. http://i44.tinypic.com/20r8w9j.jpg lol i have both games installed. glad i didnt buy TF2 GODDAMN IT SUCKS compared to team fortress classic totally ruined the game. so you could just carry on play TF1 and their no problem. or maybe you just like complaining no if ur gonna make a new game actually put some effort into it otherwise just dont make it at all.
[QUOTE="NYrockinlegend"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="gamewatereddown"] There is no xbox360 first person shooter made as a technical benchmark for 360's hardware like killzone2 was made for ps3 as technical benchmark. meaning there's no games pushing what the hardware can do physics,level design or graphics wise. And with all that technological muscle flexing, Killzone 2 has been reviewed lower and sold worse than Halo 3. Funny how that works. KZ2 is a great game though. I do enjoy it. Yeah, back when expectations were lower and GS went by the normal scale. Now, they go by a .5 scale. they actually have much lower expectations now, they hand out 9 like nothing now. crysis warhead didnt deserve a 9 neither did killzone2 or halo 3 infamous looks incomplete and it got a 9.0 proving my point
yea bungie really tried so push xbox360's hardware alot that's why they just updated the halo 2 engine originally coded for original xbox. just added hdr, and a few other newer graphical techniques. halo 3 runs like ass actually because was coded for out of order cpu instead of in order.
[QUOTE="gamewatereddown"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] You both have sure made names for yourselves today. I will say that much.PlaystationGrad
There is no xbox360 first person shooter made as a technical benchmark for 360's hardware like killzone2 was made for ps3 as technical benchmark. meaning there's no games pushing what the hardware can do physics,level design or graphics wise. actually, unfortunitely for 360 owners, that IS the limit.....the ps3 ones are only pushing 80-90% so ps3 owners can expect more improvements Dude ahahahah there is not even 1 first person shooter on xbox360 with the graphics engine and all mesh's and textures made only for 360. and trying to achieve best graphics possible on the hardware. that's where you fail. killzone2 was made to try to achieve best graphics possible on ps3 with the dev's current talent. nobody has attemped making a killzone2 for xbox360 aka a graphical benchmark fps.
[QUOTE="PlaystationGrad"][QUOTE="gamewatereddown"]xbox360 lacks exclusive first person shooters all i knowSpruceCaboose
and thats their main exclusive pile...so that really tells us something about 360 You both have sure made names for yourselves today. I will say that much. There is no xbox360 first person shooter made as a technical benchmark for 360's hardware like killzone2 was made for ps3 as technical benchmark. meaning there's no games pushing what the hardware can do physics,level design or graphics wise.
what sucks is unreal engine supposibly supports dynamic lighting like doom3 or crysis engine, but no games seems to really use dynamic lighting. its all lightmaps basically
Log in to comment