genaroll's forum posts

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

The ps3 definitely appears to have more variety in online games. All in all, I'd say there are probably a lot more shooter fans on the 360, simply because of Halo. But, I think there are better shooters than Halo on both consoles, and on the ps3 there's just a lot of different style games to choose from.

I just got Socom: Confrontation and I'm liking it. I feel like a dolt for not picking up this game a long time ago.

GamingZuru
Socom freaking owns, having the whole team watching you pull an amazing play is so tense. And the community is so much more mature then your typical shooter community. I got a new TV and I'm having a slight problem seeing in the night maps, I'm not sure if it's the new TV or the HUGE patch the game had. DO you have any idea what I'm talking about?

Turn your brightness up.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
Lettuce be reality .It will only own it.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
RDR>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MAFIA 11>GTA Imo of course.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="Antwan3K"]

another thing that is awesome about PSN+ is that the content is going to continue to be there.. so month after month, PSN+ gains in overall value for the consumer.. for example if you subscribe to the service 6 months from now you will still be able to download a day one game like Wipeout HD in addition to all the content that has been released since then.. that being said, a year from now a new PSN+ subscriber will have tons of free gaming content to look through on day one..the $50 entry fee will instantly pay for itself in most cases since you will literally have access to hundreds of dollars worth of free gaming and discounts..

i cant see how a "gamer" can bash such a great concept yet in the same discussion he/she could defend XBL Gold's pricing structure and strategy.. for my $50 a year im primarily getting additional games and gaming content every month over what i would normallyget with PSN.. for a XBL Gold subscribers they're primarily getting access to online multiplayer over what they would normally getas a XBL Silver member.. 'nuff said..

games and gaming content cost money.. so i understand paying a subscription fee for access.. at this point, online multiplayer should be free.. so i dont understand that subscription.. so if you dont find the value in PSN+, fine.. dont subscribe.. but dont pretend that paying M$ for something that should actually be free is such a great deal either..

Antwan3K

So you would rather pay 50$ for wipeout hd instead of getting it cheaper at a store.Thats really all there is to psn+ free games,but unlike what you typed you cant download past games only the games available for the current week(Yeah now its only a week you get).You obviously dont have plus .

i do have PSN+.. and ive already went back and downloaded content from over a couple weeks old.. so im not sure what you are talking about.. Wipeout HD is definitely one of the more talked about titles currently availble for the service and if what you were saying is true, if a person subscribed to PSN+ today then they would not be able to download the game.. that is not the case..

Unless you did it before August 4th your lying.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

another thing that is awesome about PSN+ is that the content is going to continue to be there.. so month after month, PSN+ gains in overall value for the consumer.. for example if you subscribe to the service 6 months from now you will still be able to download a day one game like Wipeout HD in addition to all the content that has been released since then.. that being said, a year from now a new PSN+ subscriber will have tons of free gaming content to look through on day one..the $50 entry fee will instantly pay for itself in most cases since you will literally have access to hundreds of dollars worth of free gaming and discounts..

i cant see how a "gamer" can bash such a great concept yet in the same discussion he/she could defend XBL Gold's pricing structure and strategy.. for my $50 a year im primarily getting additional games and gaming content every month over what i would normallyget with PSN.. for a XBL Gold subscribers they're primarily getting access to online multiplayer over what they would normally getas a XBL Silver member.. 'nuff said..

games and gaming content cost money.. so i understand paying a subscription fee for access.. at this point, online multiplayer should be free.. so i dont understand that subscription.. so if you dont find the value in PSN+, fine.. dont subscribe.. but dont pretend that paying M$ for something that should actually be free is such a great deal either..

Antwan3K
So you would rather pay 50$ for wipeout hd instead of getting it cheaper at a store.Thats really all there is to psn+ free games,but unlike what you typed you cant download past games only the games available for the current week(Yeah now its only a week you get).You obviously dont have plus .
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="khoofia_pika"] Btw, very innovative TC.

Better than your threads.

What, I was the guy who made the "Demon's Souls will be Disappointing" thread last month. :x

Will be dissapointing,will be 2008,will be 2010,will be last month.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]

lol certainly not

fun-da-mental

Hehe i just waited for someone to comment on that :D

:lol: @ draw distance

Infamous doesn't have very good draw distance but Uncharted 2 surely does. This debunks your claim that PS3 can't do better draw distance.

Of course the distance will be high he is towering over everything.But in Uncharted you cant visit must of the places you see at anytime.

Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"] still no game on the 360 graphically can match Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2, the proof is in the games not in how equal you say they areKevinButlerVP

Rage? A game doesn't have to be exclusive to have good graphics, you know.

Rage isn't out yet, we have no idea how it looks yet in its final stage and a dev confirmed at E3 that all three version would run at 60FPS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd0RtabEah4

The ps3 might have 60 fps in cut scenes. I jokes
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="genaroll"][QUOTE="GamerProDude"]Baseless claims? You guys are hyping things you've never seen and claiming the game is more advanced then the currently most advanced games on consoles ever. :lol: Your the one making baseless claims. It's all hope and wishes from you guys. It's going to come back to bite you. That's a guarantee. GamerProDude
Do you know why halo reach has better tech than killzone and uncharted.Its because of all the things they cram into that one little game.You must be in your own world to think unchated and killzone even has half the things you would find in reach.

What???? That's content... What does more content have to do with being more technically advanced? We have a lot of confused Halo fans in this thread. That's the problem.

Yeah im not a halo fan just saying the obvious.But I never wrote anything about content.Reach has huge maps,vehicles,stealth kills,and other stuff all in one.Thats why it has better techSo you can just stop using graphics as your excuse.
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerProDude"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerProDude"] Not when the game has been so hyped for every single little thing about it. Some of those things aren't going to be as good as expected, and the so called "haters" won't let you guys off the hook that easily after all these bogus claims. Example one, all this Halo Reach is more technically advanced then KZ and UC etc.. That's going to backfire so hard lol.

, nah, it will backfire on you when reach releases, sells more copys than every ps3 exclusive this year combined anf gets GOTY, ee i can make baseless claims about the future as well,i so smarty clever,lol

Baseless claims? You guys are hyping things you've never seen and claiming the game is more advanced then the currently most advanced games on consoles ever. :lol: Your the one making baseless claims. It's all hope and wishes from you guys. It's going to come back to bite you. That's a guarantee.

Do you know why halo reach has better tech than killzone and uncharted.Its because of all the things they cram into that one little game.You must be in your own world to think unchated and killzone even has half the things you would find in reach.