i have to laugh at the DC in this thread, 'it's only a slight difference' really? seriously? the whole ******* lawn is missing, in nearly all multiplats the differences are hardly noticable, but this iw worse than RDR, seems to me the Ps3 version needs all the exclusive DLC it can get just to make this game on par with the 360 version, this has got to be the hugest difference seen in a multiplat since bayonetta,loldelta3074The ps3 version iw not that bad.I think it iw still as good as the 360 despite some problem.But it iw what it iw.
genaroll's forum posts
if you have both syetems, and you buy the 360 version because it has grass and pass up on the free missions, you are a fool. shabab12Dont underestimate the power of the grass.
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="mystervj"] I'm not sure, most sequels drastically improves on their predecessor that it's hard to compare them this way, so this might be a rare case where the sequel didn't improve enough? If I have to guess New Vegas probably wouldn't retain it's AAA status it's predecessor held.mystervj
there are lots of factors that affect a game's score. some areas get improved...others not so much.
Even if Gears 2 didn't improve in all areas, it's hard to justify it's 0.5 drop in score without factoring the improved standard over the years. GT3 also score 0.5 higher than GT4 but GT4 def featured greater content and better gfx, so the standards can change pretty drastically within a generation. Gears 1 was alot darker than gears 2 but 2 was more action packed.Gears 2 is like hello kitty compared to 1 maybe thats why the difference.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="coltsfan4ever"]I agree with this. Reach looks good but to compare it to Killzone is laughable.GamerProDudejust as well we are not looking at it from a graphical standpoint then, the TC's op had nothing to do with graphics, only the cows are looking at it from a graphics point of view. Tech is in large part graphics, Halo fans are ignoring that otherwise this thread would have died already. Once they realize it it'll be over. No,tech is more about visuals,environment,game play,sound,and ai.Good graphics is just something extra.
[QUOTE="coltsfan4ever"]I agree with this. Reach looks good but to compare it to Killzone is laughable. It definitly looks better than killzone 2. Plus, it has arguably one of the best art styles in any video game. It looks happier than killzone 2 but not better.[QUOTE="edo-tensei"]
Lol, this threat is good for a laugh. If you're looking at halo reach from a graphical standpoint you already failed.
mr_poodles123
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"] so is online poker :)ohthemanateeno it's not. don't even pretend to compare them Farmville > Guitar Hero Uno+live cam>farmville
Log in to comment