gfhgfhtutyutyut's forum posts

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.111v

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

well according to Kojima its the ps3 that can do stuff the 360 cant.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's


no last time i checked Kojima is a very respected person in the video game community who has made several award winning games and a crappy dev doesnt get awards. oh and if he was such a bad dev then how did he make a ps2 game look better than most xbox games.

lol, mgs3 doesnt even look as good as xbox launch games like halo man.

not even close.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.kage_53

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

well according to Kojima its the ps3 that can do stuff the 360 cant.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

John Carmack, Mark Rein ,Tomunobu Itagaki and the FIght Night Round 3 team said PS3 is more powerful. Kojima isn't lazy. He knows more about hardware then you ever will. Many early ports Xbox got from the PS2 were better on the PS2.

john carmack hasnt worked on ps3 hardware, itagaki said that from paper specs never working on ps3, EA said ps3 is less powerful fight night round 3 proves  3d crowds 360  vs 2d on ps3.

mark rein isnt a dev,  cliffy b said 360 is more powerful he actually is a dev lol.

more devs have said xbox360 is more powerful, ps3 has more processing power, but overall power, no,

a systems power isnt all CPU, it's software, how much memory usable, gpu power, etc.

xbox360 is more powerful complete package than ps3.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

oblivion looks better on xbox360, overall regardless of what review sites say.

TekkenMaster606

 

So basically, the opinion of some low level troll on the Gamespot forums. One that can't even create a proper username is worth more than dozens of professional video game journalists and reviewers, that actually have degrees and work for credible sites.

 

Wow, just wow. 

gametrailers, shows xbox360 version is better.

80% of the textures look better on xbox 360 and only about 20% of textures look better on ps3, like character models. 

like i said overall XBOX360 VERSION WINS.

plus ive seen on other forums people with both versions saying xbox360 overall wins.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.111v

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

well according to Kojima its the ps3 that can do stuff the 360 cant.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts

oblivion looks better on xbox360, overall regardless of what review sites say.

fight night round 3 has better models on ps3, but framerate is worse and the crowds are 2d so overall xbox360 wins.

ps3 doesnt beat xbox360 in any multiplatform game.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,



Lol, do you even know what your talking about?

No X360 is not more powerful than the PS3, it's just that Ubisoft half-asses there games on PS3.

A SLIGHTLY more powerful GPU, and a MUCH less powerful CPU, developers figure out that cell, and there'll be no need for graphic comparisons between X360 and PS3 because it'll be obvious.

That statement is wrong, it's only Ubisoft that's struggling to make games proper on the PS3. How come Bethesda made Oblivion so well on the PS3 and Ubisoft can't?


they had almost an entire year after the 360 version to make it better(oblivion)

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?



Lol and that CPU advantage is BIG

http://youtube.com/watch?v=oLte5f34ya8&mode=related&search=
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ehwFOM4CBKA (Not even using the GPU)
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=osstats

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

 



Lol where are you getting your info from, can't just be coming in here and making things up.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.



You have absolutely no clue what your talking about do you?

And Lol you said "FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL."

The point is those games have reached and some have surpassed 360 graphically, and X360 is the system that came out a year and a few months ago, and is the easier one to develop for. As for VT3, if two different developers made the game and the game is graphically superior on the PS3, what does that tell you? If another development team came in for Ubisoft, then their games would probably actually be superior on the PS3 version.

Perception, just a bit of advice here. You might want to start using facts in your arguments? then.... you know.... you might actually win one some day down the road ;)



thanks for the tip, lol

virtua tennis on xbox360 had a new sega dev team, virtua tennis on ps3 had the franchise creators sega's best dev team, of course am2 will put more work into their virtua tennis game.

xbox360 version looks better though, it has anti aliasing, ps3 has none has some nasty jaggies.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.munu9

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts

Hey people i am a new poster here at gamespot.

 

I wonted to talk about the 1080p res that is on the 360. I have a ps3 and a 360, and for some reason when i play games on my 360 in 1080p the games textures are blurry, ala nba street, and virtua tennis 3. and for some reason the games speed slows down a bit. With every game i play on my 360 in 1080p, it appears thatthe screen is just getting streched from a 720p res. upsclose it dosnt even look like the picture gets any better.

But when i play virtua tennis and nba  street on my ps3, the games look crsip, and there is no slow down, and the game actually fits to the screen like it was a 720p game. and the game actually looks beter in 1080p. the only game that dose not look quite so good in 1080p is virtua fighter 4, which dose exactly what the 360 games are doing, looks blurry, and runs a lil slow. the same happened with sonic on ps3.

 this is when  i really thought of it, the ps3 is doing games in native 1080p while the 360 is doing games upscaled to 1080p. and games like vf5,and sonic on ps3 are also upscalling while games like vt3, nba street, nba 2k7, gthd,tekken dr, are all natively 1080. this puts me atthe conclusion that the 360 can not do true 1080p, but can blow up the picture to supportthe 1080p screen, but its being upscaled. But it seems like the ps3 was built for 1080p games, and can push that res natively, with no hassel atall.

 

 

also ps, did any one notcie while playing vt3 in 480p that the cutscens runs fast, but while playing the game in 720p, or 1080p the cutscens are very slow like there going in slow motion r somthing., this happens on both system. 

MultiplateOwner

virtua tennis and nba street on xbox360 are both 1080p  native 60 fps

There's no such thing as fake 1080p or true.

if the native resolution is 1920x1080 over component, vga,dvi,hdmi they are still true 1080p.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts

xbox360 version of oblivion overall has better graphics.

Better HDR anti aliasing, most world textures are better on xbox 360 higher framerate

ps3 version advantages, anisotropic filtering, faster load times, and better character model textures and a few world.

overal xbox360 version of oblivion is graphically better than ps3.

Avatar image for gfhgfhtutyutyut
gfhgfhtutyutyut

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gfhgfhtutyutyut
Member since 2007 • 52 Posts
[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="2largeadults"]

"But, as I mentioned earlier, the PS3 version of Oblivion is a definite
technical improvement over the 360 edition. Even if you have the latest
Xbox patch installed, this newest port holds an advantage with its
quicker loading times (which are almost twice as fast as the 360's),
fewer framerate hitches, sharper textures, a better draw distance, and
a brighter overall picture."

 

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/775/775711p3.html

 

Hey look. I just killed the thread.

 

 

 

 

:shock:

2largeadults

nope, GAMETRAILERS PS3 VS 360 PROVED XBOX360 HAD BETTER GRAPHICS

PS3IGN=PS3 FANBOYS DUHHH LOL

WHERE'S THE PICTURE PROOF WHERES'S COMPARISON?

POST FAILED IGNPS3 FAILED BECAUSE GAMETRAILERS SHOWED XBOX360 WON.

EVEN WITHOUT PATCH, MUCHLESS WITH PATCH.



A ****c sign of desperation. The all caps screaming in an attempt to upstage my sound, logical argument with pure passion.

I'll post it here again since it seems to hit you in all the right places.

"But, as I mentioned earlier, the PS3 version of Oblivion is a definite
technical improvement over the 360 edition. Even if you have the latest
Xbox patch installed, this newest port holds an advantage with its
quicker loading times (which are almost twice as fast as the 360's),
fewer framerate hitches, sharper textures, a better draw distance, and
a brighter overall picture."

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Delicious.

no, because IGNPS3 DIDNT COMPARE, WHERE'S THE PICTURES FROM IGN READERS TO COMPARE 360/PS3?

see ignps3 failed.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18116&type=wmv&pl=game

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18084&type=wmv&pl=game

THE XBOX360 VERSION DOESNT EVEN HAVE LOD PATCH INSTALLED WHICH IMPROVES GRAPHICS EITHER.

 

 

 

VIDEO SHOWS PS3 VERSION=DOWNGRADED SHADERS, TEXTURES ETC, AND 360 VERSION IN VIDEO DOESNT EVEN HAVE PATCH.