gpvalkyrie's forum posts

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

FOOLS call others noobs

Someone that calls one a Noob is a fool. Because he sees himself as a superior being because being better at something virtual (at something that actually does not exist in the physical world) and therefore lets his anger or frustration out on some people like me, that just go in for the fun.

People that call others Noobs, are just fools. When I hear that on a game channel, unless it is meant in a funny non-harmful way, I usually just add that fool to ignore right away. I have no time for fools in my life, there are plenty out there in the game servers as well as in these forums.

Hope I could answer some of your concerns there, don´t bother with those fools is my advice, just ignore them.

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts
I don't really watch tv so I guess the answer is pretty obvious don't you people think ?
Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts
Thanks a lot ! Wow, after reading some books about it, you guys got no idea what you've been missing. If some want to get a hold, get to read the Grail Quest book series by Bernard Cornwell, 3 books telling a story of a British Archer during real events that happened in the early parts of the 100 year war. I was never too big into reading until I read this !
Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

Hello,

After reading now several books on the hundred year war and such, I came to the conclusion that I loved to play some games that never really intrigued me, namely the strategy games focused on medieval strategy warfare. I know there is Age of Empire's which I bought, but it just is not the same, I mean there you focus so much in advancing as fast as possible to the next Age Period, that you never really spend fighting with Knights and men-at-arms and such, you only focus about "Quick, get to the powder age so I have guns since the enemy already advanced there!!!".

What are some great games out there, only focused on medieval time peroods between 1300-1500, strategy games, that you think are worth buying for single player !!!

Thanks !

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts
I am playing Travian now, which actually seems comic, childish and easy like but the further you get down the game it really gets complicated in terms of forcing you to make certain decissions. It takes a while for you to get far in the game, to gain massive forces and such, you don't actually see them battle, but I am having a blast with this game. As I said, the first 3 weeks you merely upgrade and build up your town and resources, but once you got those, start trading and such, forming armies, it is really interesting and keeps you entertained 30 mins a day, which is great, you don't actually spend thousands of hours at it in a short time.
Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts
I started playing Runcescape, I have never, in the history of my life on the internet, wasted so much time on such a horrible, boring game. LOL
Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

GUYS STOP !!!!

Stop blabbing, he asked the following, what number would you give it if 10 was the best. He doesn't care why, why not, how come, oh but I would give it a 7, 7.5 or an 8. Just one number, plain simple.

6

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

Whoever did it then failed miserably and wasted all of his time (although sure a good try) because you cannot compare the virtual size or movement of any kind of wave pattern and then compare it to the real world surroundings, you can't do that. For example, I can't take out a ruler now and start measuring Command and Conquer units etc and say that they are X(unit) tall and Y(unit) wide. You could, if it would not be VIRTUAL. Remember, what I write here does not exist unless I press the print button on top which basically teleports this information I provided (tho not with en epr) into physical paper that is in my hands, then it would be considered real.

You could however, once a Quantum Computer exists narrow those problems down to its particle structure, then comparing particle of those to real time particles of structures, then on mathematical terms explain after having compared its "particle count" to the reader.

Analysing the movement of a laser shot from a space ship and compare it to how many pixels per ns (nano second), it travels does also not make much sense because in the real world, this gets back into the principles of physics of acceleration, speed, the resistance the laser beam or projectile encounters through the dense air, or "vacuum" of space (space is not entirely empty of matter), therefore, since we have NO experience made so far on that behalf, all its use for determining size and speed are absolutely invalid.

People should rather focus on quantum science, teleportation and the multiverse instead of trying to do something that goes against all laws of physics. Sure it is interesting, but not acceptable in terms of calculating a concrete answer.

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

Interstate is the only game that I plaid more than 10x over and I still love it. It is funny how the games they made before, many of them like C&C1, Interstate 76 etc just have so much better replay value than this stuff they make today, like Crysis, what a waste of money. I actually just plaid it because the game reviews once lied again with their dishonest ratings.

Avatar image for gpvalkyrie
gpvalkyrie

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 gpvalkyrie
Member since 2006 • 302 Posts

It's like a Half Life 2 on a tropical place without the "walk along the wall and you're ok" that HL2 has. In FarCry you can choose to swimm around an island and dive under patrol boats to get to a target, or go through the jungle, stealth style, or walk along the road rambo style and blow everything up, or drive along the road and run everybody over, or what I prefer to do, jump out of the jeep when it is down to a flaming inferno, then I shoot at it so it explodes near enemies, the blast killing them too.

Should you get Far Cry. Damn striaght you should