I think that would be great but I'm not really sure how they could pull it off. There isn't enough variety in the weapons, armor, and pets to really make it a unique experience. Many of the players would all have the same weapons and clothing which could get pretty lame. I think what Microsoft should try to do is make a Fallout 3 like game that instead of being a single player game, it would be a massive online game which would keep people leveling and gaining newer and better items, weapons, and armor.xL33TxTALENTx

There's already a game like that being developed, it's called Project 13 from the creators of Fallout 1 and 2.

To TC, don't see the point in a Fable mmorpg, why don't you just hope for WoW for consoles? not that it will ever happen though, WoW is too hardcore for the casual gamers of the consoles, wich are like 90% of them, my advice, get yourself a 50 bucks video card and play WoW on your PC, that simple.

But so you know, a Blood Elf hunter called Legolas is REALLY original in WoW.

I always have my mic on, I like to hear people talking its more interesting then silence.harperseth

I totally agree with you, i find fun to hear little 12 year old white kids trying to speak all gangsta style, laugh my butt off and they're like "what the **** is wrong with ya' daug mother ****er!" with a puppet like voice, just makes me laugh more, hehe.

The TC's opinion is wrong.

Yeah, I said it.

TheHumanDove

While i realize you'll probably never read this answer, who says what kind of opinion is wrong? saying north is actually the east is wrong, because everyone knows it for a fact AND because it's proved to be a fact, while other things that doesn't have anything to do with ethic(don't know if that's spelled wrong) nor reality, are up to the majority(again, maybe spelled wrong) so, if most of the people say it's a Mario clone, it is a clone, and im with them.

Can you still D/L Expansions if you don't have a gold xbox live membership? Mine runs out next month.sup3rman_001

Yup, only free content such as demos are restricted for silver users.

[QUOTE="rocketman97"]I like everything about the game except for the lack of an ability to move while shooting. with that many quick moving zombies at once, sitting still while sluggishly firing rounds just doesn't really scream "genius idea" to me. However, the graphics, coop and everything else ive seen so far are stellarkenken2g

I agree. Not being able to move and shoot is just dumb, even if it was this way in the older RE games. It's a new gen now... we should at least be able to walk and aim or roll away or something. I think just that alone kills the gameplay and makes me not want to buy it.

YAY for Gears of War, if you want to play GoW with zombies then go buy Dead Space, leave alone the REAL games.

so many new comers to the RE series. its kinda sad to see such a great series overlooked for so longed and the picked up because everyone esle is getting it. And thats what everyone complaining about not being able to move and shoot at the same time is doing. Thats never been possible in past games and so im glad its not now. wouldnt have been a RE if it did allow that. and moving wouldnt have made it more fun or given the player more options or playability. it would have just made it easier to play it like every other game out there. and for it not improving much since RE4 lets look at it from what we know and not what your guessing.

1. new story= upgrade

2. vastly improved graphics= upgrade

3. gameplay mechanics+co-op integrated smoothly= upgrade

4. deadlier foes and harder bosses= upgrade

5. and last but not least the return of Wesker= ULTIMATE UPGRADE

and since thats all we know, including everyone on this site. it looks like its chapping up to be a very nice sequel

ceells87

I think RE5 is going to be a great game, but none of your points was actually relevant, seeing it the way you see it, makes the game sound more like an expansion.