greensand24's forum posts

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

Since people want to talk about bullshots and what not and harp on what UC3 looks like in DIRECT FEED native resolution:

To put things in perspective, here is the only ingame native resolution 1080x720 pic of Gears 3 avalible, now compaire that with this UC3 image...gone leave it at that

casharmy

Actually, we can compare betas. Which we did, we compared critera textures, Gears are superior. Like it's been said, both will look superior in some areas.

And this is also in-game?

I'm sorry but this is Single player footage that's being shown and talked about in this thread. the MP betas are irreivant for this argument here wheather beta for gears looked better or not.

also that is a gif, what of it? wasn't the argument in this thead basedon "direct feed" and native resolution pics? Funny how quick people forget orginal arguments when things are put into perspective.

I could go find some impressive looking gifs of UC3 as well but that's not what this therad was about.

But most of the Gears shots/videos have been gameplay stuff while you guys keep posting touched up shots and videos of uc3. If you're gonna put up gifs can you at least provide a couple of gameplay shots/vids with huds. But I guess I know why they're not posting gameplay stuff because of the jaggies.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
From what I've seen Gears 3 looks better. I mean UC3 looks just as good but these jaggy shots really sealed it for me. Also why are people bragging about the lighting in UC3? It's not that good. It's either over done and unrealistic or just looks severely under-developed. Also from the shots I've seen Gears 3 looks like it's using more poloygons in it's structures and the environment. There honestly have been some spots in UC3 where you could make an argument that it was a high-rez ps2 game. Anyway Gears 3 will be better not just in graphics but as the overall game because MP is where it's at and the UC3 MP just pales in comparison. Speaking of MP there have been some MP shots of Geras 3 that look better than some SP uc3 shots. Chew on that for a minute.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

And PS3 fans praised Borderlands on PS3 to be a contender for console graphics king...Oh wait?

ABCarmine

Are you trying to insinuate that Borderlands is on par with Crysis 2? You are making yourself look sillier by the minute. But please continue. Laughing is good for overall physical and mental health.

You really did miss his point didn't you, wow....

Actually no I didn't. He was trying to poke fun at 360 gamers and simultaneously trying to put PS3 gamers in a better light by saying that the PS3 fanbase would never give a game consideration for graphics king because of pop-up. The "oh wait" comment was a dead give a way. He failed in his attempt though because you see Crysis 2 is doing FAR MORE things graphically and technically that pop up can go virtually unnoticed. Sadly the same cannot be said about borderlands lol which is not in the same graphical league as Crysis 2.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
So says Kevin V. He's on Gamespot, so only his opinion counts around here.hoogiewumpus
.......aaaannnddd the white flag has been thrown. LMAO.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

You're using IGN to claim ownage? :lol:

Hit up Digital foundry for a real comparison.

theuncharted34

Agreed i already have and I've been telling some of your cow mates that it doesn't get any better than digital foundry. But you have some cows pointing me to IQ gamer LMAO and Bend The Truth. LMAO if you go to the tech forums at Beyond 3d it's actually prohibited to use Bend The Truth when discussing comparisons because well they're just not good at it and are considered noobs.

Funny thing is, if you actually saw the DF comparison, you'd see the 2 versions are completely equal, besides the Ps3 version having higher Anisotropic filtering, and the 360 version having a higher res, so they balance each other out.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-crysis2-face-off?page=3 From digital foundry: "There's little doubt that the Xbox 360 is the cleaner, crisper experience and for the most part it commands a small but significant frame-rate advantage and fewer little glitches" "On balance, 360 has the edge in terms of visuals and general performance, but PS3 more than holds its own, bettering the Microsoft platform in some areas." Yes the PS3 does some things better than the ps3 but the 360 is the overall winner. What is so hard to understand lol. Lol that Anisotropic filtering was so important that digital foundry couldn't stop talking about it as they wrapped up the discussion....Oh wait. "but PS3 more than holds its own" lol. The tone in that sentence sounds like they almost feel bad and apologetic as to not upset the fanbase. Lol the 360 is the better version. Move on. Lol do you cows feel that threatened by Crysis 2? What has the PS3 done to you guys? LMAO that reminds me maybe you guys should watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pZf-MNo4Fg
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

i dunno whether to post a facepalm pic or just sit here laughing.Its a minor and i mean very very minor resolution bump and its said that the image quality is barely noticeable, so all your playing is the idiotic number game.

theuncharted34

IGN 360 graphics: 9.5 IGN PS3 graphics: 8.5 I wouldn't call that minor. That's a whole point. It's one thing to have a 9.5 as opposed to an 8.5 which falls short of greatness. Also you're criticizing me for numbers but on this very site you guys label an 8.5 as AA while a 9.5 is AAA. As a matter of fact you guys call 8.5s FLOPS! Are you calling the crysis 2 graphics on PS3 a FLOP? LMAO that actually sounds quite funny. I'm gonna use that. Thanks.

You're using IGN to claim ownage? :lol:

Hit up Digital foundry for a real comparison.

Agreed i already have and I've been telling some of your cow mates that it doesn't get any better than digital foundry. But you have some cows pointing me to IQ gamer LMAO and Bend The Truth. LMAO if you go to the tech forums at Beyond 3d it's actually prohibited to use Bend The Truth when discussing comparisons because well they're just not good at it and are considered noobs.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

Crysis 2 renders in 1152x720 on the Xbox 360 and 1024x720 on the PS3, with both versions getting the same use of temporal 2xMSAA (multi-sampling anti-aliasing). And as you can see in the opening screenshots above, the two games aren't far off of each other with regards to image quality. The 360 game is a tad sharper owning to less horizintal upscaling taking place, but at the same time the difference can often be barely noticeably in motion, and neither build features the clearer IQ of a true 720p game.

http://imagequalitymatters.blogspot.com/2011/03/tech-analysis-crysis-2-360-vs-ps3-vs-pc.html

Apparenty, so is the 360 version lol but you seem to think they are worlds apart, good one.

razgriz_101

Wow you're not the sharpest knife in the draw are you? The same site that you're trying to use for ownage is telling you that the 360 has better image quality and better performance which is backed by IGN and Digital Foundry! NEXT!

i dunno whether to post a facepalm pic or just sit here laughing.Its a minor and i mean very very minor resolution bump and its said that the image quality is barely noticeable, so all your playing is the idiotic number game.

IGN 360 graphics: 9.5 IGN PS3 graphics: 8.5 I wouldn't call that minor. That's a whole point. It's one thing to have a 9.5 as opposed to an 8.5 which falls short of greatness. Also you're criticizing me for numbers but on this very site you guys label an 8.5 as AA while a 9.5 is AAA. As a matter of fact you guys call 8.5s FLOPS! Are you calling the crysis 2 graphics on PS3 a FLOP? LMAO that actually sounds quite funny. I'm gonna use that. Thanks.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
By the way why have people, especially cows, ignored the information from this link... http://www.computerandvideogames.com/309595/xbox-360-improved-with-ps3-only-graphics-feature/ I mean this was a ps3 exclusive graphics feature that can now be done on the 360 but better.
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] "awesesome looking graphics" that's the joke of the week right there!

charlesdarwin55

Wow man you seem pretty hostile. What's the deal? How is it a joke? As I said stop playing the PS3 version lol.

U mean the version with superior af, no screen tear and more consistent framerate?

Ooookkkaaaayyy, I can see I need to stop trying to have a discussion with you. Go read Digital foundry and IGN. Oh and IQ gamer. They all put the 360 ahead of the PS3 version. Nice uuuhhh "chatting" with you lol.