Will it also add the ability to pause the bloody offline singleplayer game for the main game too? A video game in this time and age shouldn't lack one of the most fundamental ability when there is no reason for it to not have it bruh. Bruh the year is 2025. The game is offline. The game is a singleplayer game. Bruh bruh. This is literally the only reason I refunded the game. :DDD

We still waiting for Prince of Persia Redemption and offline patches for The Crew series lol.

I hope they especially fired the people who are responsible for making Lara Croft not look like Lara Croft and make her scream a lot. :DDD

How is this a full version when most of the announced characters are not added? Where is my Gene? :DDD

People don't "play" this game "for fun", they use it to be educated on how to make money in real life to afford eggs and new video games. :DDD

The hell? It would make sense if it were a known fighter instead. What's next? Making Taylor Swift in the rooster? They think they releasing Fortnite or something lol. :DDD

"Fighting games are no stranger to guest characters"

However as far as I know all of them are fighters so it makes sense lol.

I just noticed the guy is not even voiced by Cristiano Ronaldo. This makes the sense more nonsensical like they didn't have permission from the guy or something ayy lmao.

@mogan: Oh yeah, these bugger bugs were enough of a bug to be a meme lol.

However, in the context of boredom it wasn't boring as the first game and Brotherhood. It was okay. It was just not "wow" as much as the 2nd game.

However it seems like an action game so how it's related to Star Trek beats me. I would imagine a Star Trek game to be like Fallout New Vegas and TES Oblivion in adventure sense in side content while the gameplay is like Mass Effect due to how squad-based game it would be. Whole point of Star Trek is the sense of adventure, dude. If you see it as an action game then you missed the whole plot lol.

Since his opinion is nonsense I bet he is the reason for why Diablo 3 is ruined with childish BS, considering this BS is childish too lol.

It's nonsense to delay the release of a game just because of another game because of many reasons:

1) Not everyone has to care about that game and a GTA game is no exception.

2) People can play lots of games at once. For example even when GTA San Andreas released I played tons of games with it. My reasons was mood, a little boredom and I didn't want to finish the game too quickly.

3) It's a bit new generation greed reason: If they'll make it $100 people will play other games until the game is in discount. It also indicate possibility of for half a year its sale may be too less than expected. So-called experts anticipate certain numbers of sales for this game, yet their idea based on an era we have left behind long time ago. Now everything is expensive, even eggs and most of jobs are not enough to make a living. People started to give birth to lots of kids just to afford surviving by aid by having a children and making children work and all. It kinda turned out into new generation Victorian era no matter you living in America ducks yeah. :DDD

4) GTA 6 may require a system people cannot afford to buy for years, so they will buy video games they can play.

5) People may wait to have free relax days before they play GTA 6, until then they will play other games.

I mean I can give lots of reasons but you got the idea.

My personal opinion is: GTA 6 doesn't interest me at all so I won't gonna play it. If any company delay game because of GTA 6 then I'm not interested to pay money to them to not support their nonsense decision. I better play football on the street then lol. Everything is political now so any decision anyone makes can face strong backlash and political side. "I don't like the hairstyle of this CEO so I'll use their products the bomb their headquarters" are a new reality in the year of 2025 after all. :DDD

My uncle works at Valve so sometimes he gives me Steam codes of video games he steals from Steam servers. :DDD