@dj_bottom_nuts: It's common in gaming news to refer to the studio responsible for developing the game as "developer" since another company which is referred to as "publisher" takes the responsibility of publishing and distribution
@sladakrobot: Also this means that intrusive DRM practices are unjustified. If they have confidence in their product which they have given enough time and resources, most likely it will sell well, even without DRM
@hystavito: After I've seen some gameplay footage which included a bit of the first TV sequence, I'd say they wanted to avoid making CG cutscenes or cutting the graphics cost a bit. Alll it did was make the game worse, apparently
@WarFox89: I agree, but still EA can do many things to destroy a franchise too. I was totally caught off guard by what they did to CnC TT lol. I never thought someone could be this low on IQ to destroy his most popular strategy franchise. On the other hand, Activision took Call of Duty when it was still fresh, innovated a bit, then turned it into an annual release game. You can imagine how this went wrong: some of their releases were bad if not horrible
handofkain's comments