[QUOTE="doom4dukenukem"][QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]Is there some source to this? In-engine pre-recorded cutscenes, not CGI, I assumed it was just more anti-aliasing etc. like FFXIII's pre-rendered in-engine cutscenes. Do they model swap in that as well?

I don't really have the eye for these things.

Anastasia1997

Only the main character doesn't get LOD according to Naughty's Dog's lead character artist.

As a PC gamer, why should one get a 360 again?ninjabeaver1

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]NPD only covers the USA, not the whole of North America or South America, not even every retailer in the USA. There's also Africa, the rest of Asia, other places that aren't tracked. The PS3 is a beast in Europe, moreso after Move and performs better than in the US. Or maybe Sony overshipped and I type this from atop a 100 foot mountain of unsold PS3's...SilverChimera

Wow I literally laughed at that. That is mega horrible. I have to say it, but KB was right.

Microsoft needs to get their act together and stop relying on Kinect, the hardcore gamers is what brought them success in the first place. Gears of War 3 is the only AAA title they have left and now they are just hyping Kinectimals and whatever. This is pathetic. I have no hope for the next Xbox. At least Sony is still catering to the hardcore audience with Move while pumping out AAA first-party exclusives.

Blazerdt47

Remember next year will be controller + kinect. This is just shovelware.

Microsoft will still make comments like they've been doing most of this year I would suspect. They'll be doing well this holiday.

[QUOTE="fezano"]

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

I think both can do stereoscopic.

_Matt_

I knew HDMI 1.4 was required for a 3D output, but I thought both the 360 and PS3 could simply update firmware to enable compatability. If that is not the case, is the 360 still stuck on HDMI 1.2b?

from what i understand ps3 can do tru stereoscopic 3d(producing two images) while 360 can only have a fake 3d(zbuffer tech)

Easily, IMO...i'm having a blast playing it.

First of all the combat is perfect, yes it is similar to GOW, but why shouldn't it be? the combat works and does it better due to the developers better mapping the controls. Combot plays and looks better.

Graphics GAMEPLAY-wise..looks better than Gow 3 from textures to character detail, gow3 only looks better in cutscene form (characters)

platforming/puzzles are better and overall so far it's much more balanced/consistant when it comes to action/platforming/puzzles, etc over gow 3

I believe i'm half way through the game and damn is it amazing. Story is profound and does some of the best voice acting i've seen.

I don't see why people are complaining that it isn't castlevania because it isn't 2d, what did they expect? get with the times and i can't see any other gameplay mechanic added for such a game..so the GOW like style is common sense for the type of game and it simply WORKS. This whole nostalgia crap is rediculous.

Both IGN and Gamespot reviews are a joke!

This is of course MY OPINION.

[QUOTE="Slashkice"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]LOS does NOT look as good.It is not safe to say.Honestly, DMC4 looks way better than LOS.SolidTy

Demo to demo, Lords of Shadow does look better. I know the retail version of GOW3 is improved, but the same could apply to Castlevania.

I know the Castlevania demo recently released, but so did the actual game as well. The GOWIII demo was an old E3 build.

I would suggest we just compare the two actual games, since they are the final products, and lucky for us, they are out.

Its still technically the best looking game on consoles regardless of its art direction. tomarlyn