hip-fire's forum posts
We got a Time traveler. He's from 1950 when everything is still Black & White & GrayPeople seems to forget that the real world is not as colorful as they think it is ==.
Kashiwaba
No, but seriously the Middle East is not over highlighted with white and black. Just go YouTube Iraq and you can clearly see how washed out this game is compared to some real footage[QUOTE="hip-fire"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]
It should be more like Halo, bright pink and purple aliens jumping up and down, and the player models should be blue and red power ranger type outfits.
Bebi_vegeta
Sir, sir... you do know this is a game right and not a sim?
Tell that to the PC gamers, who always brag about how Real Life PC games are
No, but seriously the Middle East is not over highlighted with white and black. Just go YouTube Iraq and you can clearly see how washed out this game is compared to some real footageIt should be more like Halo, bright pink and purple aliens jumping up and down, and the player models should be blue and red power ranger type outfits.
tenaka2
Yeah, the area it's set in isn't very colourful either so the fact that it has 'no colour' can only be a good thing.fabz_95When was the middle East white & black? Even MGS4 got the color right Lol remember when PC gamers were thrashing Killzone 2 for the Grey even though the setting was after an atomic bomb. Now there is no atomic bomb in BF3 and the game had Zero colors. What goes around comes around Lol
[QUOTE="ocstew"]If anything it mowed itself down.lhugheyThat may be a little harsh, but KZ3 is not anything special. I've tried to like it, but it just bores the heck outta me. Then you havent tried it But I think Geow3 already looks way sharper/ cleaner than UC2. The only thing holding geow2 the graphics crown was due to no colors. That that it's full of colors, UC2 got serious competiton.
[QUOTE="hip-fire"]ur mostly right, brink and homefront just cant compete reall with killzone's style....but crysis, i dont get why u say that. Perhaps if ur bringing up the whole consolization thingy to mind then ur gonna hate it, but in its own right, darn, those graphics are some of the best graphics to date on consoles. Im not sure if i would say they would surpass killzone 3 graphics much, but they are really good...and the crysis 2 beta was worked really well, the majority think the beta has been a blast, like a perfect hybird of halo and call of duty feel. Also, some respect for brink is deserved since we all really dont knwo how its online will work out yet, and its graphics were never aiming for realism, in fact its the oppostie, it wants a surreal, comic booky artsy look. So really, ur right in saying homefront cant stand a chance and that battlefield 3 will likely beat killzone..but crysis and brink need more respect in this regardKillzone 3 was the first big FPS to come out this year and though it wasnt perfect, it's been mowing down all others on consoles, one after another; Multiplayer + Graphics wise.
-Homefront
-Crysis 2
-Brink (soon to be)
All the way up until Battlefield 3. Haters can hate all they want
ms555
you just rant about what i exatcly said; BF3 is the only one who can dethrone KZ3. and C2 console graphics, not PC
When Gears & Killzone were being compared to real life, gamers (PC gamers esp.) jumped at them saying the real world is full of colors. So now BF3 fanboys, the world is full of colors and BF3 is not
Log in to comment