you will learn, you have to be creative with your powers. It feels aweome to sprint into a group of guys grap and throw one into the others knocking them down, droping a claymore or remote charge and then sprinting away all before they react.

uuummmmm.... Xbox 360 has a better controller, better online, xbla is aweosme

but ps3 has better exlusive games both 3rd and first party exlusives and looks better.

so idk. i play 360 more.... but ps3 has uncharted and other good stuff...

i guess i PERSONALLY like the 360 better, but they are both great

either way PC is infinately better than both of them

Steam

BEST graphics

Best exclusives

Best indie games

Best for FPS

Best online

pretty much 100 completely backwards compatible (steam, good old games,and forward compatiblilty)

MODS

RTS games

Nuff said

why isnt there an option for NONE because thats what i would choose. those games arent about multiplayer. ithey are about story and immersion.

call of duty is the trend that needs to take a break.

what WRPGs besides mass effect have sex scenes?

lazerface216

the witcher has A TON. its made in poland but i think it still qualifies as a WRPG

These trends are not necessarily bad things, and I am not saying should be gone from ALL games (just used less often). My top five off the top of my head would be:

1. Weapon Loadouts (Goldeneye Wii has them....REALLY!?)
2. Regenerative Health (some games this is great for, but come on now!)
3. Sex Scenes (Does every WPRG need them?)

What do you guys think need to be used less often?

NaveedLife

i disagree with all of those

1.weapon loadouts are fine, customability is great, i dont think its negetive

2.regenerative health is silly, and unrealistic, but man its awesome. ifyou dont like it play TF2! (which is an incredible game)

3.Sex scenes are good. We arent all little kids, we can be mature enough to not feel weird about sex in games. Its a subject that is just beggining to not be taboo, if games are going to move forward as an artistic medium then they need to be able to deal with sex in a mature way.

Duke Nukem and I will FIGHT anyone who disagrees!

XboximusPrime

.... 10 bucks it gets delayed

[QUOTE="hotsoup26"]

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

Any answer other than Battlefield 3 is wrong.

McStrongfast

idk, that depends on how good Cryis 2's singleplayer is. if its incredible and the multiplayer is at least good then it could definately be a contender with battelfield 3.

i also have a feeling that battlefield 3 wont come out this year, i mean we have hardly seen anything from it.

yeah maybe. and of all the years to really try and beat call of duty this is definately it. Cod will still sell but nobody is sure if the quality will be there this year. It does bother me a little that they are putting 2 battlefield games out in only a year and a half, i mean i know they were working on them simultaneously, but still, it just seems fast. I also feel like mass effect 3 might get delayed as well because that also seems early.

anyway the battlefield games and Cryisis are two of my favourite FPS of all time (other than all of the stuff valve does, and bioshock and stalker) needless to say, im super psyched for both

[QUOTE="hotsoup26"]

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]Er... every year. :?

super600

every year except 2007..... oh wait, orange box, bioshock and stalker came out that year NEVER MIND.

im super curious to see how the next cod does, both score and review wise. they have infinity ward, raven and sledgehammer working on it plus you can be sure that they are farming out alot of the busy grunt work to other companies. its definately gonna be interesting.

I seriously have a weird feeling MW3 is going to score below 90% on MC and possibly below 80% and maybe even 70%.Three devs working on one game hasn't always been succesful and with Activision's greedy attitude the game's quality may decrease.

yeah, i think its safe to say that the game we will get this year will probably not be as good as the one we would have gotten if Infinity Ward hadnt been gutted. I doubt it will fall that far though, activision throwing all of those studios on the project is proof that they are determined to not let it fail. Call of duty is their cash cow and they cant afford to let it bomb. it might not be as good as blackops but it will probably be "fine" i srsly doubt we will see a 90+ metacritic average.

[QUOTE="hotsoup26"]

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]Er... every year. :?

Nintendo_Ownes7

every year except 2007..... oh wait, orange box, bioshock and stalker came out that year NEVER MIND.

im super curious to see how the next cod does, both score and review wise. they have infinity ward, raven and sledgehammer working on it plus you can be sure that they are farming out alot of the busy grunt work to other companies. its definately gonna be interesting.

Is raven doing the multiplayer? anyway it makes sense. This CoD was an infinity ward game to begin with and so they are probably making all of the imporant creative decisions which means they are doing singleplayer, also, Multiplayer between the titles doesnt really change that much, and so raven already has that basic design to work off of.

I am not excited to play next call of duty, but i am really INTERESTED to play it. its the same way i feel about Duke Nukem forever, i want to see how all of the controversy surrounding those games effects the final product.