i-rock-socks' forum posts

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

If I didn't already buy new and tasty id be thrilled, but nice line up all the same

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

im no fan of amiibos but they are high in demand, and as we all know some are more rare than others and demand crazy prices online.

so my question is a simple one, why doesnt nintendo produce enough of each individual amiibo to fill the demand. more sales means more money for nintendo and unless they are the assholes on ebay selling em for 100$ i dont see how not keeping up with demand helps nintendo.

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

i stopped caring

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Shadow Wars is a game i dont see get much praise but it should its good, and its cheap so bonus

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@Zen_Light said:

@Chozofication said:

@Telekill said:

@Zen_Light: Here's my train of thought.

If you want children included in games as being killable, then you must have some want to kill children.

So you want to kill adults.

Good luck getting an intelligible response.

He seems the kind that thinks it's fine to hurt others as long as it's indirectly as opposed to direct. Like poisoning someone is ok but shooting them in the face is not. He thinks selling kids drugs in games is perfectly fine, but shooting them in games is not. He thinks shooting mercenaries is fine, once you check their IDs first to make sure they're over the age of 18. He thinks shooting pixels 18 and up is fine and healthy fun, but under 18 means you want to kill them in the real world and have mental problems.

bananas...

actually he probably wont respond at all cause he cant think of anything intelligible to say

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@Telekill said:

@Zen_Light: Here's my train of thought.

If you want children included in games as being killable, then you must have some want to kill children. If you want to kill children then you have problems. It's an assumption based on a clear line if thinking with one step coming after the next.

Children don't need to be killable in games.

That's the only effort I'm going to put into explaining it.

you mean thats the only effort you CAN put into explaining it

also i have no "want" to kill actual children so your full of shit

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

silent hill if you live in silent hill

dark souls if you live anywhere else

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts
@Chozofication said:

@Jacanuk said:

@Chozofication said:

@Telekill said:

Why would you want to kill a child?

Why would you want to kill anyone, then?

That's a dumb ass question.

The only thing dumb here is your idea that kids and adults are somehow the same thing.

Was that in my post?

Just wondering here :

Killing adults - euphoria

Killing kids - sick

Care to explain that?

virtual children havent had the chance to live a full virtual life unlike virtual adults. who are we to virtually end their lives in their virtual prime. hell they could grow up to cure virtual cancer.

also am i the only one who finds the guys profile pick of agent 47 ironic. killing everyone brutally for money is fine, but kids makes you a monster. in real life maybe, but again, its a fucking game

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@so_hai said:

Not sure, how do you feel about a game that lets you kill pregnant women?

im fine with it

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

i wouldnt say its the best zelda ever and the original got boring with all the sailing but i liked it overall