i-rock-socks' forum posts

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@nini200: look im dont wanna get into it with u, not about quest 64. i didnt feel the game was worth my time then. i surely dont feel its worth my time now, even if its just to shit on it. i dont hate the game enough to list all the things in detail that i hate about it, ask one of the many other people in this thread that said they hated it too. im sure one of em will feel passionately enough to inform u why they hate it. or this may help, i agree with it fully.

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@nini200 said:

@i-rock-socks said:

@nini200 said:

@i-rock-socks said:
@nini200 said:

Quest 64 did not suck and it was actually quite well made, I have no clue why you would think that however an opinion is indeed just that. That was the rpg I was coming in here to say but saw you mentioned it.

thats right an opinion is just that. and my and most people that played its opinion is that quest 64 is a pile of shit. i have no idea why u would think otherwise however an opinion is just that.

Because the game was not a bad game. It was open world, lots of towns, exploration, the fighting engine was unique and worked well, a good level up system where you choose what element you wanted to level up and more. Honestly the only reason I can think that people would say it was a bad game is because it came out as competition against Zelda for which it really wasn't similar to outside of the open world and exploration. Quest 64 was a good take on the classic RPG formula.

glad someone enjoyed it i suppose

Thank you lol now could you explain why it was a bad game? I'm curious

everything you said, except put a more horrible spin on it. hated the leveling system, the graphics, the story, the combat, the combat rate. the magic system i disliked, although i believe it had potential.

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@nini200 said:

@i-rock-socks said:
@nini200 said:

Quest 64 did not suck and it was actually quite well made, I have no clue why you would think that however an opinion is indeed just that. That was the rpg I was coming in here to say but saw you mentioned it.

thats right an opinion is just that. and my and most people that played its opinion is that quest 64 is a pile of shit. i have no idea why u would think otherwise however an opinion is just that.

Because the game was not a bad game. It was open world, lots of towns, exploration, the fighting engine was unique and worked well, a good level up system where you choose what element you wanted to level up and more. Honestly the only reason I can think that people would say it was a bad game is because it came out as competition against Zelda for which it really wasn't similar to outside of the open world and exploration. Quest 64 was a good take on the classic RPG formula.

glad someone enjoyed it i suppose

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

i usually spaz out and dance

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts
@nini200 said:

Quest 64 did not suck and it was actually quite well made, I have no clue why you would think that however an opinion is indeed just that. That was the rpg I was coming in here to say but saw you mentioned it.

thats right an opinion is just that. and my and most people that played its opinion is that quest 64 is a pile of shit. i have no idea why u would think otherwise however an opinion is just that.

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@elheber said:

@i-rock-socks said:

@elheber said:

@i-rock-socks: CDs weren't an alternative during the SNES era.

still doesnt mean it cant be done

By that logic, watches would still be as popular as they used to be despite smartphones in our pockets.

people werent clamoring for more archaic wrist watches. and by ur logic, no games would have been made for the n64 at all

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@elheber said:

@i-rock-socks: CDs weren't an alternative during the SNES era.

still doesnt mean it cant be done

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@elheber: @Guy_Brohski:

snes used carts and it had more rpgs than i can count

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@Bigboi500:

i forgot all about paper mario

Avatar image for i-rock-socks
i-rock-socks

3826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 i-rock-socks
Member since 2007 • 3826 Posts

@SolidTy said:

@i-rock-socks said:

@SolidTy: i almost didnt make it past you paying 560$ for quest 64, how is that possible :O

Typo. It was only $60, but $20 than the PS games at the time which $40.

shoulda figured lol.