GOD I can't wait for this game!O_Lineman17

Same...

[QUOTE="ishxan"][QUOTE="deniiiii21"]

I dont understand the hype, i played it and played multiplayer, but this is outrages the G4 and people are going nuts over it, I dont understand whats so great about it. Its a nice FPS nothing special.

Tuxified

If I could I would wear a Master Chief suit... everywhere.

Master Chief

Is a shiny metal object that attractive? ;)

Mass Effect is a game I really want. And if doesn't come to the PC, I'll buy a 360 just for that one game.Thompsonwhore

You will have to wait a LONG LONG time before that happens. BioWare has a PC project called Dragon Age, and for now Mass Effect is a trilogy set for the X360. So if it indeed comes to the PC it will be at least two years.

I dont understand the hype, i played it and played multiplayer, but this is outrages the G4 and people are going nuts over it, I dont understand whats so great about it. Its a nice FPS nothing special.

deniiiii21

Master Chief

I don't have such a system. I only have a laptop with 8600M GT 2Ghz C2D 2GB RAM, so I don't think I will max Crysis out, nor will a lot of PC owners. A lot of people can max it out, but unfortunately most will only be able to do medium.

Being as such I don't think I'm as exited about Crysis as the people who can max it out. In essence everyone who hypes Crysis can run it at max.

[QUOTE="ishxan"][QUOTE="SuperMario_46"][QUOTE="skazbot"]

You do realize being a sheepmeans that you basically can't complain about rehases on other systems right?? I mean c'mon nintendo has had the same six games for the past 15 years.

SuperMario_46

That's not what im talking about, if Zelda's score is lower because it's the same gameplay as OoT, why not Halo?

Maybe because Halo is better than OoT and Halo 3 is better than TP? Wow, that was a leap of logic; Halo is just a better game.

No, just no. You can't compare a classic with a regular shooter.

And if so, better or not, it's a rehash of the previous game, if halo got 9.5, so should Metroid, a game that actually does something different with the core gameplay.

I think you are missing the point here. Halo 3 keeps all the fundementals of Halo 2 because they were damn near perfect, but whatever Halo 2 did wrong Halo 3 made it right and added a host of additional content to throw it into new heights. MP fundemental gameplay is far from perfect and it can't be compared to Halo. MP or Zelda are classics of an age gone, Halo is at a different level when it comes to gameplay. By the way, you have to face this... Halo is a classic, and a behemoth at that; I mean do you ever see a game hyping up to be a MP killer or Zelda killer?

[QUOTE="skazbot"]

You do realize being a sheepmeans that you basically can't complain about rehases on other systems right?? I mean c'mon nintendo has had the same six games for the past 15 years.

SuperMario_46

That's not what im talking about, if Zelda's score is lower because it's the same gameplay as OoT, why not Halo?

Maybe because Halo is better than OoT and Halo 3 is better than TP? Wow, that was a leap of logic; Halo is just a better game.