I prefer single player too, I find the MP to be too much time consuming once you get hooked to it...Maybe is the competitive nature or something. Id rather play a game with open ended gameplay and tons of replay value..
I'm gettin' this on pc, I wanted to get it on xbox because I got the first one there but the framerates and visuals are a lot better on the PC, im gettin' a wired 360 controller for the pc though..
Well actually im not sure if both version are coming out at the same time.. if thats the case then pc for sure but if its like the first time that the 360 version is coming out way sooner then I dont think I could wait for the pc version 'cause im kinda anxious of playing this one..
It depends, if its heavily online or with a strong mp I go with the ps3 'cause I stopped paying for live when I got fed upof halo 3... In any other case I usually go with the 360 version 'cause I got a lot more games on it so my collection gets bigger unless of course one of the versions is way better than the other one.. and also since I got my rig all juiced up Im going with the pc versions more often...
Really? You're really going to pretend price isn't a factor? :lol: If the PS3 was in a price range seen before for gaming consoles, you would have a point. But they have had a unit that has been priced higher than ANY other console before (with Sony taking losses). To say that has no affect on the buyer is funny at best. I guess since the Ford Taurus has sold more than any Ferrari ever made, the market must have decided that the Tauras was the higher quality, better performing vehicle........ :lol: And then when you come to your senses on price being a factor, you must take the economy into account.PoppaGamer
Ferrari's are a high end Luxury item and for SURE are not direct competition of the Ford Taurus...geez man read before you post...
I agree with the TC, the ps3 is trainling down hard and of course there are many reasons behind it ( its an excellent console for sure) but in a direct competition with Xbox and Wii or even only counting the Xbox as direct competition its been a failiure so far..
It really depends on the type of game you're playing.. for fPS i find the kb/m to be way better for aiming, everything just feels more natural to me, maybe you feel it so weird cause you're not used to it yet but believe me, once you get the hang of it you wont like to play a fps on a pad again... There're some fps on consoles that are above average on controls like halo, but in general i'd rather play them on my pc.. For other genres the pad is better like in GTA or other action games...
No it isnt.. I had a blast playing mp and is a good game with pretty good graphs (for consoles) but the gameplay is average or above average at best no matter how many fanboys say Period....
I think im going with crackdown on this one... Mainly because it didnt tried to be more than a big open world playground to do whatever you wanted, the leveling was addictive and I actually spent a good chunk of time grabbing all the little green orbs... Infamous was good also but I had bigger expectations for it, with all the hype and the good/evil options that turned out to be very bland for me, the powers and cruising trhough the city were a blast for sure, but being all maxed out and jumping from roof to roof throwing away cars in crackdown was awesome as well...
I have'nt played the witcher unfortunately... of the other options I'd say fallout 'cause you can actually play like you dont care about the others, just a wastelander trying to survive, the first one was better at this though... Love Fable 2 and Mass Effect to the bone but the choices are way to good or evil, and this is the case even more for infamous...
Log in to comment