[QUOTE="jhalter1"]WAIT WHAT'S THIS!?!?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_exoskeleton
"Exoskeletons could also be regarded as wearable robots: A wearable robot is a mechatronic system that is designed around the shape and function of the human body"
Kane04
I never complained about the design, I was complaining about the color, scroll down to read my original first 2 posts. Then someone took it that direction to, again, excuse it. Its silly green and its a silly complain YES my beef with Halo is that it has a LOT of silly things that piled up makes up for a LOT of silliness, then wrap all that in not one original idea and I can't see why people think its like the second coming of jebus. Its a cool game to play, and it does play nicely with a control, I had a lot of fun with the 2 (the first levels on earth anyway mostly) but its far from the master piece people try to pass it for. Hey you didn't address the rest of my post.
jhalter1
Because it was long and the answers for it are on my previews post, no point in copy paste it all over again. I stand by my arguments, unlike some people that make a "funny" and think they won or proven me wrong. No arguments = autoFail. And that goes for personal attacks to, but then again i wouldn't expect much more from hardcore halo fans."Theres a reason why warriors stopped using full body armor when the gun as invented, but NVM that, this is Halo, nothing has to make sense"
-You said this. This is what I was debating. You implied that there is a reason that warriors stopped using armor. I'm sorry, but the above quotation is wrong. Warriors did not stop wearing full body armor because it doesn't make sense. They stopped wearing it (full body armor; they still wear armor of some sort, nobody runs into battle naked)because firearms development outpaces armor on humans, unfortunately.It makes perfect sense within the Halo universe sir.
NO. You atill haven't addressed a majority of the things I brought up from your post.
Let us go through the things you have not addressed.
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"...and still they didn't even bother trying to make the game MS was promising."
-What exactly did Microsoft promise, in regards to Halo 3? Also, how did Bungie fail to meet this standard set by their publisher?
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"All the current mindless and empty modern FPSs just copied the formula, along with a multiplayer where all (sic) you is run around looking for people to kill with no finesse and depth to it what so ever."
-Please elaborate.Specifically, the "depth" and "finesse" parts.
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"...so much better than Halo 3 (that was previously said by them to be the best thing since the big bang)."
-Alright! So it looks like you enjoy using excessive hyperbole. Can you please point out which reviewers, if any,explicitlystated that reach is "...so much better than Halo 3" or"...(that was previously said by them to be the best thing since the big bang)?"Honestly, I would like to know which reviewers said Halo 3 was the best thing since the big bang. You need to stop using hyperbole, it ends up making your argument look ridiculous.Although, I am asking you to clarify because I may have misinterpreted what you were trying to say.
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"Mindless level design, where half the places and props in them you can't even tell what the hell that is, whats it used for and what was that place build for when there aren't any shooting going on. "
-Please elaborate.
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"MGS was that good on a PS1"
-PLEASE take a look at this. The sound is annoying so just turn it off, but pay attention at about the 6:20 mark. Man! The way he punches that guy and causes him to do the world's fastest flip is just pure awesome. Such great animation, absolutely on par with Reach. /s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REpWxe22hHk
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"if its that good why did it need that much promotion?"
-Sir, why would Microsoft advertise the biggest franchise on their console? Why would they do that? I can't possibly think of a single reason why Microsoft would throw millions of dollars at advertising this particular franchise, which happens to be the face of Xbox. It MUST be because the game is trash, and not because Microsoft would throw a stupid amount of money at advertisement to move consoles. Nope, that can't be it, Halo must be trash. That's the only logical conclusion we can draw from video game advertisements.Don't you dare act like you answered this. We all know it makes way more sense that Microsoft wanted to move consoles, as oppsed to covering up Halo's supposed "suck." Honestly if you have an issue with this logic please see the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"but the reviewers somehow didn't notice any of that because Halo is not rated like any other game."
-Here is a line from a Halo 2 review from this very website,"Some unsightly graphical issues."Boom. Would you look at that, it's almost as if you lied when you said reviewers didn't notice. Isn't that crazy?
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"its a PS3 exclusive get outta here because it can never be good enough so lets kill it in the reviews as a result it never had a chance in sales no the industry won't move that way."
Are you kidding me? Do you honestly believe that reviewers just automatically HATE the PS3 exclusives? Can you provide some kind of proof? Anything? Honestly, this looks kind of bad. I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide some proof of this.
THIS IS WHAT YOU IGNORED.
"but remember who popularize the run and gun, one room after the other, over and over and over and over again? Halo: Combat Evolved"
-Yeah, that might have been Quake that did that. Let's be real here, Halo has drawn a lot of inspiration from pc shooters. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Quake popularized it. If I happen to be wrong, feel free to correct me.
Master_ShakeXXX
Log in to comment