jhunte99's forum posts

Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
I bet all these people saying that it's capcoms fault, pirate games themselves. I just cannot imagine someone who doesn't pirate games sticking up for the pirates.

And I'm probably going to get the reply 'I never said I'm sticking up for the pirates' but it's what it looks like i'm afraid. Can we not just agree that piracy on some level, big or small hampers sales. You will never stop piracy but the situation can be improved. Personally i think every publisher should release their games through steam. And the retail copies should be made to run through steam. Best system there is at the moment.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts

I would NOT disable superfetch unless you're trying to run Vista with not enough RAM. It's a valuable feature.

It's mostly games with large open maps and complex textures that you will see the benefits of 4GB of RAM. Doesn't anyone remember back in the day when they first started playing BF2 as one did the texture-loading stutter step at the start of every level as their HD spun away in abandon? Well with 4GB that's a thing of the past. All those FPS with huge individual levels now load smoothly and quickly.

WDT-BlackKat

lol i remember that, was really annoying i just stood stilm and did nothing while i got a cup of hot chocolate or something. i use 8GB of RAM (sig lies, cba updating it) And it was a MASSIVE improvement from 2GB. Crysis benifited a lot but i'd say company of heroes got the best improvement. oh and load times are a fraction of what they were, not in the older games though as i don't think they were designed with that amount of RAM in mind.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
An 8800GT or HD4850 can maximize all settings on the game up to 1680x1050 sans AA and run very well on fps.

Since AA is nigh irrelevant at high resolutions like that it is quite safe to say that even a sub $200 video card can max the game.

WDT-BlackKat

errrrrrrrrrr.......... no.
I play at 1920x1200 and AA is absolutly needed, I don't think we even have monitors available that run at a resolution where AA isn't needed. And an 8800gt and 4850 has NO chance at playing at very high at 1680x1050 with good fps.



That is all very high with no AA or even AF
You will definetly need a 9800gx2 or gtx280 to get crysis on very high... just.

Again still no AA so i wouldnt call that maxing it and at 1920x1200 the gtx 280 gets 32fps and the 9800gx2 gets 35fps. Pretty poor. crysis warhead promises to run better.





I think there is no point in spending that much money to try and max just one game however.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
I bought the game and on the 5th page of the manual there is a big thank you for buying the game. that made me :)
When there is a demo of the game out and how well it runs, there is no excuse to pirate this game.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts

Corsair 650W TX

Saphire 4850

Samsung 500GB

Slightly over at £246.53 inc. postage but the 4850 is about the same performance as a 9800 but with whats in stock, a lot cheaper.

edit: you can't compare with US prices, they get stuff cheaper than us. newegg has the 4850 for
$174.99 so you would think that would cost £88 here. It doesn't it's roughly £125 ($247.62)

Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts

The complaints got started years ago with a long line of very bad ports. Far too many developers would do a one for one copy when moving a console title to the PC. This created numerous games that were a lot of fun on the cosole but looked, played, and sounded bad on the PC. When creating a port you must rework it for the new platform.

Player expectations have a lot to do with it too. People who play primarally console games expect something different from their games then we do on the PC.

The hardware divide is still a big factor. Deus Ex and its sequal Invisible War are a good example. With Inivisible War they tried to build a game that looked good on the PC but still ran on an X-Box using 5 year old technology. In order to do this they had to make massive changes to the overall gameplay and feel the first game introduced us to. The open enviroments took on a very boxy feel and the character customization options were cut down to nearly nothing.

I'm not trying to say Inivisible War is a bad game. If it had come out first it probably would have won over a lot of critics. However, sequels are always compared to the previous game and this one did not measure up.

Drosa

That's a good post, i agree with that. But like i said i think that's beginning to change now.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
It's all about the target audience really. What you are all saying is correct but it is exaggerated a bit. Consoles have some great games. I love most of the shooters on PC yet i also love many games on my 360, i am a huge fan of halo, i love the gameplay and i love the story.

However Ubisoft made that horrible port of resident evil 4, that was quite possible one of the worst console to pc ports there is. but it's nice to see now that capcom is making better ports. Devil may cry 4 looks and runs great and resident evil 5 has been said to have been built from day one with the PC in mind. And don't forget crytek. They won't release crysis on consoles because it won't run, although it hardly even runs on PC :P

I think PC's have gone through a bad patch lately, great games have still come out though. I think PC gaming is going to get better and has already started to. Microsoft seems pretty committed to it. I think their games for windows program is a great idea.

Go PC! 8)
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
I have recorded a demo of a cheater, what do i type in the console to see the steam id's. thanks
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
pc's will on paper always be more powerfull than consoles. But that doesn't mean it will run the same games at the same graphical level. Games for consoles are optimised a lot better. remember doom 3 took a beast of a pc to run when it came out yet the original xbox still ran it. Not at the same graphic level. but it wasn't that far behind considering it had a 733mhz pentium III.

Games on consoles continue to look better as time goes on with the same hardware, to achieve that on a pc you need to upgrade. When someone says that pc will last you 2 or 3 years, yeah sure it will. but you won't be maxing out games for 2 or 3 years.

So in short, yes, the next consoles will beat pc's of today.
Avatar image for jhunte99
jhunte99

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

39

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 jhunte99
Member since 2003 • 2673 Posts
get 4GB!!!! i got 8 because i'm greedy, but i came from 2GB and the performance difference is MASSIVE! Everything is so responsive. And games run sooooooooooo much smoother. I definetly recommend anyone who has vista 64bit to upgrade to 4GB of RAM.

edit: ignore my sig, i haven't updated it yet.