Why are all these so called "gamers" endlessly debating which games are better than others. It's a never ending spam of "game x" vs. "game y". Frankly it's so pointless and foolish that I think these people deserve the endless amounts of arguments that they get theirselves into, instead of enjoying and actually playing these games. In fact I hope they argue so much they never get joy out of games again, because they honestly aren't made to play them, but instead yak about the minor details.
I recently read a biased review of a fanboy about a game that "rivaled" one of his favourites. It was evident from the beginning that this "gamer" had not even played the game, stating a ridiculous clear time that was under half the minimum stated. So of course he whined that it was short, making up a flaw that is not even apparent. He then compared the game being reviewed to two of his favourite games, one of which he hadn't even understood completely, and wrongfully compared.
True gamers should be (and many are) rejoicing that good quality games are steadily being released, even when it's not a huge sales period for games.
Top quality games have been pouring into our market steadily for the good part of about a years time. Who cares if you like one game or another, that doesn't mean that it's "rival" is a peice of junk. Games shouldn't have to compete against eachother on this level, that's for developer's and publisher's to do. Our job as gamers is to enjoy the titles they put out, which lately have been incredible.
Simply put, games are made for enjoyment. When you start to politicize the games that are out and attempt to make them battle for status against eachother, all such enjoyment of the games is lost. Now, I love discussing games, and I think it is a very reasonable thing to do when you love them so much. But when the game no longer has an "outstanding and deep story element" in now has a "story element that pwns game y cause game y's story sux0rz" it's a different story. Why is game y's story horrible when most of the time, the person doesn't even know what it is. The probable truth is (or at least in the most recent cases) both games have excellent stories, and I'm thankful that I now have two games to buy instead of one.
Of course we do have the make the decision over which game to buy, and this could be the start of the battle. Do they only have enough money for the one game that get's hyped more than the other? So the game they can't afford is out of reach, and therefore the worst peice of game material out there? The cause is only speculation I guess, because I for sure have no idea what's going on in these little punks heads. I just play video games.
-James Logan
Log in to comment