ok, the word about the ps3 version being inferior is apperently from an article in PSM3 magazine. there is a long thread about it on the game trailers board with scans of the magazine. anyway google and see for yourself i guess.
im wondering as well as i have seen some threads floating around saying the PS3 version is inferior. I have not seen any sources linked to them as of yet. anyone who can clear this up?
you know i was thinking many of the same things. I dont know how it got such good reviews when compared to the cream of the western RPG crop. I physically cringe every time a preview talks about how well fallout 3 is coming along and they say how much it feels like oblivion.
i just started playing chrono cross for the first time(ive owned but strangely never played it). it took a few minutes but after that i was hooked. i also just replayed fallout 2, i thought the graphics would be unbearable, but its crazy how well that game has held up.
the textures are bad, anyone who doubts this should check out halo 3, those are textures. however, from what i heard, the textures were bad because they were dead set on using 1080p and for some reason this limited the memory for doing top notch texture mapping? the game looks great overall but i noticed this too.
Log in to comment