@unkosolz. One more thing. We all know Sony has the best dev's and they care about what games look like. The dev's in the U.S. work like U.A.W. workers. Just pay them so they they can go home. Sorry U.A.W. guys. Your work sucks. It might be better if you did not have a U.A.W. and you had to look out for your self. Do you have the Unreal eng 3? If not download it and do something with it. To make good games you must have good tools and to tell you the truth, Unreal eng 3 is not all that good.
@unkosolz.The 360's video card is better and you can't drag the CPU into this because one will use any PC to it's max. There is only one game that has. MGS for PS3. It used everything the PS3 has. Even the make for the game who's name I can not spell was not happy with it. Kind of sad because the New Splinter Cell coming out for the 360 in 2 10 is a lot better looking. Sony will not even use a cellCPU nextgen.They say they will use Nv on the PS4 but from what I hear they may let this new CPU run every thing. Kind of what they did with PS1. Also the PS3's CPU can not run like a multicore CPU. It only has 1 core. Also the PS3's cell is only half the speed of a real cell. IBM and MS both came up with the Cell thing and then MS drop out of it. Why was the cell even made and when? in 1993 IBM and MS started the Cell and in 1995 MS drop the cell when MS found out that CPU's ever going to get faster and wont be as much. in 1996 the cell was running IBM computers. If the cell CPU is so good, way have they not been used in home computers? i know why. They suck at doing a lot of things at one time and IBM has no planes to sell them in home computers. If you want to have better looks in games and run better you need more ram and look at some of the ATi cards and look at the nv cards. I'm talking NV200vsAti4000 cards. Ati cards are not as fast as the Nv cards if you look at the core clocks but because they use more ram and, more piplelines, and stream p's, they walk all over the nvidia.
@treydawg1. *11.. My bad. @guitarist1980. Once more. It is up to the devs on what a game will look like. It is a art. If dev's wanted to make game look life like they will. Have you seen Mass 1 or 2? Have you played them? You can't do a first party vs first party. it is all about what the maker wants to do. What about games coming out for 2010. Have you seen some of the games coming out for 360? The kill anything the PS3 has out. Also have you even seen what dev's think about the PS3? They hate it and most of them call the 360 real next gen. I also never posted that the 360 uses dx 11. It uses 9. Yes video mem plays a big part. That is why they make games for the PS3 first then port to 360. You can not dunp 512mb of info to something that can only use 384 tops. They tryed that and the PS3 ports drop frames like crazy. 30 frames vs 60. that a big drop. Still, no one has used up all of the 360's video mem and it looks like they will start to in 2010. Look it up your self. NO ONE HAS USED ALL OF THE MEM THAT THE 360 HAS.
God.... Most of you don't get it. The 360 has a better video card and more ram. 3rd party dev's will not push games games for both systems when it comes to looks. Making a game is a art and if a dev wants to make a game look life like they will. If dev's put more time into both the 360 and PS3 games and used hall the power they had, the 360 would kill the PS3 and nothing could save the PS3. So what most of you are posting is that 380 mb will make better looking games than 512? You can not even say the Cell CPU and the fact that blu-ray makes games look even better. The fact is, most games systems will only use 10% of the CPU. PS3 can not recall data and if you look at the info in a PS3 game you will see the same file under a new name 10, 20, or even 50 times. Any ways next gen is coming and the Xbox will use DX 12 and the PS3 cant even use it because it's a MS thing.Sorry boys and girls but the 360 has the edge. Funny thing... The first xbox was way more powerful than the PS2 but every one was like, it the games! Now it's not the games it the power. So what will it be next gen? The next gen 360 is a monster. 6 gig ATi 4x chip and a 16 core CPU, also Blu-ray with it. PS4... 1 gig of video.. LOL. Read about it.
@Jack_240. @Kill_Master_312. You can't do a head to head exclusive. I posted this 100 times and no one was able to even say I was wrong. Well I'm not. Making games is a art. It is up to the dev's to make a game look real life looking or what ever look they wanna go for. Both system can make games look life like. It is a fact that the 360 has more video mem, piplines and other nice things. The 360 can use up 480 mb for video rendering and the PS3 ca use up 384 mb for rendering games. It is also why games for both systems look better and run better on the 360. Now if 3rd party dev's took more time one the 360 and used more of it's video mem, Games for both system would look a lot better on 360. It is whay dev's will make games on PS3 first then port. You cant dump 480+mb of info on something that can only handle 384 mb. So thay make it for the PS3 then port and some times do a little more to the 360 port just to make it look alittle better. if they used all the mem the 360 has, it would be night and day. As for the CPU. The Cell was a wast and sony has no plans to use the cell next gen. Dev's only use 10% of the CPU and that is on any system. Now MGS for PS3 did use everthing the PS3 had. Even the make of the game was not happy about and wants to use the 360 for the next MGS what ever there is. Blu-Ray DVD's do not help make games look better.
@ penguins227. I would never say that the the 360 could play PS3 games better. They were made to run best for that system. But my point was this. It is up to the dev's on what a game will look like. How ever it you have 100mb give or take more to play with games will look better. I think MS is telling 3rd party makers who make 360 only games to push the looks. Yes PS3 has some good looking coming from it's 1st party and a few of it's 3rd party as well. How ever the video chip inside the 360 is way better and dev's will not show it off because it takes more time and cash. It is to the point where devs just say, just make it run and look like the PS3 game and the other 100 mb is wasted.
@penguins227. As I posted before. You can not head exclusive vs exclusive. Games are a art. If dev's wanted to make games look real they will. That is why they take games on both systems and head them off. It is not just hardware that makes games look good. It is what the dev's want to do. If you wanna talk hardware.. Good luck with that. The 360 has a better video chip. up 480+ mem can be used with 10 more mb for dram but the PS3 can only use up to 380mb give or take. Wanna talk about CPU's ok. I'm game. both systems will only use 10% of ther CPU's power unless you run MGS for PS3. They used all of the PS3's CPU's (had a lot to do with not under standing the CPU.) Also think about the makers of MGS blogging or talking about how they were not happy with the PS3's GPU. That is why they want to use 360 for other MGS games. They can do more with the mem. Also, why do dev's make games for the PS3 first then port? It is like dumping 10 gal's of water into a 3 gal's tank. You cant make it fit. So game a game that will run less mem, port it to something that can handle more video mem and do a clean up job or add more detail. How ever that will not happen all the time. Look at some of the games coming out next year on 360.
@Blackops_2. You don't read, do you? You can not do a exclusive vs exclusive. Making games is a art. It is up to the dev to make a game look the way it does. If a dev wants to make a game look real life, they would. Look at what the 360 has coming next year. A lot of them look real life. So PS3 has a few game that look real life. That is what the dev wanted. When it comes to games looking real life than the 360 has it in the bag. Can a video chip that can handle up 380 mb of video ram run as well as a video chip that handles 480+mb video ram? No. The PS3 can only handle up 384 mb gaming and the 360 can do 480. That is a 100mb gap. Also the fact that the 360's video card has 48 piplines and moves more info. The PS3 has 24 or 28 piplines to run info. what it comes down to is this. What do you like to play? And looks are up to the dev'.s
joevit's comments