Well, it's good to know that you're an expert on the experts. This has nothing to do with being "Christ like." We're standing by our convictions, and because you don't agree with us we're being arrogant. I think not. I'm so sick of people that are so caught up in their own mindset that they won't allow themselves to see other's points of view. This seems to be a common trait among liberals. And before you say that's what we're doing... it's not. We are standing firm in our beliefs and defending them. We are not trying to make anyone see things our way. You, however, are spewing nonsense and failing to defend it. Believe what you will, that's not up to me to change your mind... and I'll respect you for standing by what you believe.Really, you could have gathered only a minimal idea of what I believe from this thread. What nonsense would you like me to defend? I didn't say much of anything except for that it is likely that Christianity is derived from preceding religions which your buddy wanted to turn into a discussion about Zeitgeist.[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="junglist101"]Reading back there was no debate. What I should have said is, "I'm done talking with you." And that's not what phil was getting at; he just wants to quote religious"experts" who get their "expertise" from the same flawed book that he does whilst hurling subtle insults. The bible is not a reference..
Really, I just can't stand his arrogant attitude and you two clearly have something in common. Not very "Christ like" if you ask me... Just sayin'
junglist101
How can you say that I don't see your point of view? I had your point of view for most of my life. The fact is, you can't see my point of view.
No, I see your pov clearly. You believed, now you don't. You did make that statement about Christianity being derived from preceding religions, but you never gave anything to back it up. Then you got defensive when Phil pointed that out to you.
Log in to comment