@mr_nee: A major difference in our replies to each other is that I actually respond to your questions and point out the idiocy as opposed to how you steamroll past anything you seemingly don't know how to answer and then harp on the irrelevants, aka your retarded thought process.
Aww whaaaah whaaah that wasn't in your approved vocabulary list (don't worry, this ones rhetorical)?! "Retard" accurately defines your slowness to understand, since you should no longer be ignorant to this matter. So yea, "speed it up retard" is seemingly accurate in regards to your need to more quickly grasp concepts.
What did I say in my initial response to your first comment?
Yea u can read above, but in case you won't, here's a refresher:
"Perhaps a KEY TACTIC of survival in The Division is to have GOOD GEAR"
- Now that we know you're slow in processing information, I shall exemplify how this applies to your alternative definition:
- - A tactic, or "conceptual action", for surviving in The Divison is: have good gear. "Good gear" would definitely include adequate guns found in the game. So in other words, "have good guns" could be a "conceptual action" of surviving in The Divison.
U can't even articulate a point, period. Don't get it? Of course not.
Ima ask Mr. Webster. . .
- Tactic: a device for accomplishing an end.
So what's your "end"? If I want to beat the game, I surely have to WIN. In order to win, I need consistently better gear that matches the difficulty levels I encounter.
I don't get your one-track, one-solution mentality. . .
Of course winning is A good tactic just like A-nother good tactic would be to equip good gear. They go hand-in-hand. The better your gear, the better chances you will "win" as you put it.
I didn't know how the supply drops completely worked yesterday and watched a guy scoop the chest right in front of me while we were still taking down the named enemy.
Didn't know u could walk up and take the chest regardless.
I'm still not exactly sure how the supply drops work :/
@steveaug13: @Azazel29: None of us absolutely KNOW the reasons why they're possibly going one way or the other with this, so it's really all pure speculation. I'd caution even calling it inference
jurewicz88's comments