What would you differently? I'm well aware that most people here don't believe in God. But let's suspend disbelief for a moment, and pretend that this world is the product of God. What do you think He's doing wrong? If you were him what would you do differently?

[QUOTE="kneeha"][QUOTE="bloodling"] The post is about the weakness in the Macr [QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

1. They call it darwinism, which turns on red lights.

2. What are their reasons? I looked all over the site.

That didn't give a lick of evidence or reason.

Also, in looking into the matter, it would seem that the site is pulling some rather clear shenanigans in terms of the scientists' credentials.

GabuEx

[QUOTE="kneeha"][QUOTE="bloodling"] There is not one piece of Religion in this post. What are you talking about?bloodling

There is absolutely nothing in your post.

1. They call it darwinism, which turns on red lights.

2. What are their reasons? I looked all over the site.

[QUOTE="kneeha"]Philip Skell Emeritus, Evan Pugh Prof. of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Maciej Giertych Full Professor, Institute of Dendrology Polish Academy of Sciences

K. Mosto Onuoha Shell Professor of Geology & Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Univ. of Nigeria Fellow, Nigerian Academy of Science

Ferenc Jeszenszky Former Head of the Center of Research Groups Hungarian Academy of Sciences

M.M. Ninan Former President Hindustan Academy of Science, Bangalore University (India)

Yeah, these things have a lot of credentials because that's basically the only thing they have, misleaded religious people. There are lots of religious people out there.

bloodling

Dissentfromdarwin.org. It seems many professors,scientist, and doctors from many different Ivy league, and prestigious Schools Including

U.C Berkley

U.C.L.A

Cambridge

Yale

Princeton

Stanford

M.I.T

Harvard

The Smithsonian

Are questioning Darwinism. It seems and obvious conclusion with the new discoveries in science the past few decades.( I.E D.N.A. ). Also Linus Pauling (Nobel Prize winner and arguably the Greatest Chemist of the 20th Century) Liking the Cell as "more complex then New York City" Renders are current form of Macro Evolution statistically ridiculous.

Who, exactly, and why are they credible? This looks to me like a thinly-veiled Intelligent Design group.

This is the thing that bugs me - you take something that's fairly well-established, but you say "but wait! Look at this list of people who disagree!" And you can have a list, but it doesn't mean anything, it's just someone trying to make it look as though there's a legitimate debate where there isn't.

Dissentfromdarwin.org. It seems many professors,scientist, and doctors from many different Ivy league, and prestigious Schools Including

U.C Berkley

U.C.L.A

Cambridge

Yale

Princeton

Stanford

M.I.T

Harvard

The Smithsonian

Are questioning Darwinism. It seems and obvious conclusion with the new discoveries in science the past few decades.( I.E D.N.A. ). Also Linus Pauling (Nobel Prize winner and arguably the Greatest Chemist of the 20th Century) Liking the Cell as "more complex then New York City" Renders are current form of Macro Evolution statistically ridiculous.

[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"]

Hang on, anyone can claim to have a PhD and sign the list as a scientific authority?

*Runs in* Look guys, I'm a doctor!

Hang on, anyone can claim to have a PhD and sign the list as a scientific authority?jimmyjammer69

PHD in specific fields. If you look at the list a sizable portion are proffessors.