@JusticeSoulTuna It doesn't look like Druckmann contested any of that. (Let me know whether your understanding differs.) I largely agree with what you've outlined.

I'm starting to get the impression that sensitivity runs rampant.

@aci808 Consumer interests. These aren't rights.

If you're that sensitive, stay away from such games. Play games rated for six-year old children. Draw ponies. Watch Disney Channel. Don't play games that deal with crime and violence. Also, if footballs trigger some trauma of yours, don't ask that football be played without footballs. Stay out of the stadium.

@nameaprice "im a virgin muslim and i cant figure out whats going on in my trousers :-/"

Despite what little is going on in your head, you should be able to figure out what little is going on in your pants.

@Evanrocknuma @l777l @eBentl Possibly. It could be productive in showing mistakes of "progressives". There need not be a one-sided message. Contrast itself brings things into greater relief.

Support of creative freedom, freedom of speech, individualism, pluralism, responsibility and such are matters that defy superficial assignment to conservatism and progressivism. (Frankly, much happening under the name of liberalism has little to do with classical liberalism, nor with Enlightenment.) Thus it's difficult to unearth a particular (counter-)productivity at this point. Unless one simply deems male heterosexuality as anti-progressive. "Sexual liberation" apparently entails reducing male sexual liberty, even when it comes to fiction, fantasy, and thought.

@darklord1294 "Respect" for women's what?

@Pierre-Luc Rancourt No, just 29,7%.

@Masterchief219 @rtircoklled @Axile11 What did they change?

@Evanrocknuma @eBentl Counterproductive of what specifically?