@picho86 @l777l @BloodyAura @nameaprice "I wasn't protecting her. I was commenting on sexual insults in general."
Have you defended the person whom she attacked? Did you speculate about how she would be going to jail? (None of this is mere "commenting in general"; you have addressed and attacked individuals, rather than make abstract statements.)
That aside, carefully evaluate what you deem dramatic. You appear to overreach in your attempts to diagnose "harassment". The world is not supposed to be a place free of conflict, perceived and intended insult, as well as uncomfortable social environments. All this is part of human nature. It enriches human life and complements other aspects of it. I invite you to combat excesses. But get your scale right, first.
@picho86 @l777l @kouji03 @Liquid-San @BloodyAura @nameaprice Oh, so that taunt reflecting her prior taunts/insults of comparable nature means that I am to commit criminal offenses. -- Your insanity in this misguided estimation appears staggering. Frankly, it makes you look like the kind of person who puts a raccoon into a dress and has a tea party with it. Subsequently going to jail for abusing an animal.
@picho86 @l777l @BloodyAura @nameaprice "Making sexual insults at women you don't know isn't funny. It can be very hurtful."
Interesting. Insults of sexual nature (regarding sexual jealousy) have been exchanged here. Allow me to quote how she attacked someone else, see above: "Let me guess, you've started fapping over her and I've hurt your feelings by attacking her, right?" -- I don't see why she requires special protection. Do you deem her that fragile? She doesn't seem very fragile to me. But if she wants special protection, she should please say so.
@picho86 @l777l @kouji03 @Liquid-San @BloodyAura @nameaprice "It is exactly men like you who go to prison for sexual assault, and don't even understand what they've done wrong."
If you have basis for this silly view, please outline it. You seem to jump to conclusions, at best. I'd like to hear what defines "men like me".
@JBStone1981 @nigelholden "Nothing, so long as that sexual appeal does no harm to the image of a specific group of people."
We're well past the "image" of women being merely (physically) sexy creatures. Actually, we've never been there. There's also the image of women being rather asexual and passive and the idea that women's bodies should be concealed.
Simply, few are going to think that women are not intelligent, creative, sensitive (and so on and forth) beings. Focusing on sex does not negate that. That includes pornography and it includes other forms of entertainment. We have women succeeding academically, we are aware of women's humanity and complex empathy, and we are aware of women's sexual nature -- to some degree (it is occasionally complicated). There is no excessive harm to "women's image". What indirect harm there is is inevitable in a free society.
Likewise, there's no excessive harm to men's image due to such fiction: few sane people believe that men merely care about sex. They certainly do care about sex a whole lot, though.
l777l's comments