and again no nominations and winners for halo 3....... :lol:

what would you expect froma pc developer who neverdeveloped a game for a playstation brand ofcourse you complain if you do not knowhow to develop for it...

like many devs already said if you never developed a game for playstation you gonna have a hard time gabe newell

[QUOTE="legalize3"]

[QUOTE="horrowhip"]

I never said that. You said tha Killzone 2 has better lighting which IS NOT TRUE. Ray-tracing(Crysis uses a simple form of it. Not 100% accurate but it iscloser to being perfect than anything else...)beats anything because it is literally doing the actual calculations for the light.Meu2k7

1st of all crysis does not use ray tracing stop the madness it uses HDR

http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2006/04/20/crysis_new_screenshots/2

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3147944

http://www.crysisdownload.com/cryengine2.php

2nd of all killzone does have better lightning engine it uses deferred rendering with complex geometry andfull screen msaa

http://www.gameklip.net/v/10184/

3rd you do not even know that deffered rendering has more advances lightning then your typical crysis HDR lightning....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_shading

4th get to know your lightning

http://ninja-matic.gametrailers.com/gamepad/?action=viewblog&id=125517

Yes, it uses Ray tracing on Direct X 10 ....

i gave you 3 links of crysis with the official crysis site all of them does not mention the so called ray-tracing

you step in inside this topic claiming crysis uses ray -tracing but without links so who to believe its pretty hard

a guy thats not a developer or the official crysis site hmmm lets see...

I never said that. You said tha Killzone 2 has better lighting which IS NOT TRUE. Ray-tracing(Crysis uses a simple form of it. Not 100% accurate but it iscloser to being perfect than anything else...)beats anything because it is literally doing the actual calculations for the light.horrowhip

1st of all crysis does not use ray tracing stop the madness it uses HDR

http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2006/04/20/crysis_new_screenshots/2

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3147944

http://www.crysisdownload.com/cryengine2.php

2nd of all killzone does have better lightning engine it uses deferred rendering with complex geometry andfull screen msaa

http://www.gameklip.net/v/10184/

3rd you do not even know that deffered rendering has more advances lightning then your typical crysis HDR lightning....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_shading

4th get to know your lightning

http://ninja-matic.gametrailers.com/gamepad/?action=viewblog&id=125517

5th turn of your light in your room and see how many graphics you see... NOTHING now turn it on, see thats what lightning does..

[QUOTE="legalize3"]

[QUOTE="bluebrad1974"]I have yet to see what is so special about KZ2.horrowhip

maybe buy some new glasses

wonder fi crysis can hold its stick when we see killzone sunny eviroments the thing what makes crysis ''special'' is hdrlightning that makes things pop up but we know killzone has more advanced lightning....

i mean this doesnt look that spectacular untill you drop some lights on it....

Hurray for finding an early DX9 screenshot....

huray for thinking killzone is a finished game....

I have yet to see what is so special about KZ2.bluebrad1974

maybe buy some new glasses

wonder fi crysis can hold its stick when we see killzone sunny eviroments the thing what makes crysis ''special'' is hdrlightning that makes things pop up but we know killzone has more advanced lightning....

i mean this doesnt look that spectacular untill you drop some lights on it....

I would have bought this, honestly.

If just to fund their development. Polyphony is too damn nice. 180 days for one car....1080p 60FPS....

GTHD scrapped, no money, nothing. But they give us a giant, free demo. Now they give us a mega-demo for GT5 for free with online....

Anyway, I think I'm gonna have to buy GT5 just out of gratitude.

Redfingers

hell ya i still dont understand why they give it away for free..... confused

but hey its nice

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="PoppaLemming"]

Too bad the gameplay on COD4 completely obliterates KZ2's weak gameplay

Who cares if Killzone 2 can hold a few more polygons. Compare gameplay and you will see the true winner

-wii60-

That is why a Gamespot editor said Killzone 2 gameplay is as good as the graphics, in other words "awesome".

/TLHBO

because it had technical issues in the final game on ps3with 40 mill and 250 devs dont expect that to happen again

[QUOTE="Squall_Griver"][QUOTE="PoppaLemming"]Killzone 2 will have nothing on COD4PoppaLemming

what? a 6.9 flop under it's belt? :lol::lol:

COD = AAA franchise

KZ = 6.9

COD has been proven to have great gameplay and a great story. KZ is a proven flop of astronomical proportions

So please don't flash up a couple of screenshots when you have absolutely no history of anything being released good from the company "or" the franchise itself

Funny how history is repeating itself right before our own eyes :lol:

killzone psp doesnt count anymore these days ?

besides killzone didnt score low because of content but because of technical issues those issues are the past on ps3 read gamespt review...

killzone story is way more interresting then halo thats for sure

i wonder why people are comparing a alpha game vs a beta game give killzone a chance to get to beta even if it looks better then cod4 already....

remember the motorstorm bash ?

after5 months :

just dont bash killzone lemmings just dont you wil get pwned when killzone hits beta...