[QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="Cyberfairy"] poor textures? with awesome lightning, physics, draw distance, action going on at the screen and all you can say is "poor textures, lol"
pathetic...just because not all develepors uses the Unreal 3 engine and tons of HDR
-wii60-
and bloom
once this game hits beta system wars will be empty all lemming hiding in their cave with their silly looking xbox360
Yes that will happen in that alterante reality where u come from, u still think this pre alpha? 3 years under development and not even alpha :lol: ?
we all know what ign, gamespot, 1up said about killzone 2
lets see what kikizo has to say
quote:
Killzone 2 is without question the most visually striking game we have seen on any console. Seriously. And best of all, it's 100% the real thing. This, arguably, is the showcase that PS3 was made for.
This isn't hyperbole - we didn't expect all that much based on the screenshots or, let's face it, the achievements of the original. But in motion, first-hand, this is a visual DEMON of graphical prowess. Somehow even the trailer shown at E3 doesn't do justice to the experience of really sitting down in front of it and taking time to become immersed. The only real-time thing we've seen with our own eyes that comes close graphically is Rage, (and yes, we've seen everything from Fallout 3 to Halo 3), but we're talking about the PC version of Rage, and you can bet it wasn't running on a crusty Pentium 3 box when id's boss showed it to us, that's for sure.
wii60 bbb bbb bbbut the textures........... :lol:
game industry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tiny you
Log in to comment