I dont know, for one her face looked .... horrible ... i about laughed when she was speaking. I like the PS3 and all, heck im never getting a 360, but i dont see what you guys are flipping about. Crysis has some amazing looking stuff as well :\ if not better looking. MGS4 looks just as good as well in the fully rendered scenes on the mission briefings. And i dont think the polygon count was that high, they never even moved anything which means for all we know they only have to render half of everything. And the woman herself looked crisp not realistic. Id say for that i would have to pick HL2 .... alex looks so much better than this ... thing. Sorry, but i just dont see whats so flippin awesome about this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/123856.html

that scene looks better imo and crysis was a big letdown. (and most computers wont stutter on that video ... dont know why this guys did, he had a good enough one)

Id post MGS4 vids but i dont think its necessary.

ColdfireTrilogy

This girl could have been made alot better.Anyways Crysis was like a milestone in Graphics history.But i am pretty sure Far Cry 2 will be better.And they are improving Heavy rains graphics aswell.

I dont know, for one her face looked .... horrible ... i about laughed when she was speaking. I like the PS3 and all, heck im never getting a 360, but i dont see what you guys are flipping about. Crysis has some amazing looking stuff as well :\ if not better looking. MGS4 looks just as good as well in the fully rendered scenes on the mission briefings. And i dont think the polygon count was that high, they never even moved anything which means for all we know they only have to render half of everything. And the woman herself looked crisp not realistic. Id say for that i would have to pick HL2 .... alex looks so much better than this ... thing. Sorry, but i just dont see whats so flippin awesome about this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/123856.html

that scene looks better imo and crysis was a big letdown. (and most computers wont stutter on that video ... dont know why this guys did, he had a good enough one)

Id post MGS4 vids but i dont think its necessary.

ColdfireTrilogy

This girl could have been made alot better.Anyway Crysis was like a milestone in Graphics history.But i am pretty sure Far Cry 2 will be better.And they are improving Heavy rains graphics aswell.

the PS3 is powerful, espcially with how the CELL and RSX communicate. I personally think its the most powerful for this gen, aside a PC of course. ITs just that I have read its hard to work with the development kits to get this to work to its fullest potential.

Its just he kits are expensive and are not as user friendly has the 360 or Wii for making games. It also doesnt help consoles that they only have 512mb or DDR3 ram. I know theyre dedicated to gaming, so its a bit different than a PC, that runs many applications and things at once. But 1gb of DDR3 should have been implemented. Thsi would have gotten Crysis on the console.

Heavy Rain will be awesome, Im very excited to see teh emotions and so on. Those tears look insane.
9mmSpliff

So what you are trying to say is that Crysis cant be ported to PS3 ? Dude i think it can be after watching Far Cry 2.What you think ?

not buying a ps3 again until its 250 with a decent library of games. there just isn't enough to justify 400 bucks when you can get the 360 with a much better library for half the price. mephisto_11

Yes but only without a hard disk,Blu ray,built in wifi and alot more.I think PS3 is on a very reasonable price.The library,if not better or equal it isnt that bad.

[QUOTE="shoemen22"]The ps3 is more powerful by far but its harder to program for and i say if you look at games like Gears of war 2 it doesnt look that much better then the first one which shows that its already starting to push the 360 but the ps3 still has killzone 2 heavy rain etc the Cpu in the ps3 (cell) is about 2.5 times more powerful but once again harder to program for but they are starting to get use to it just like they did with the ps2 a advantage with the cell is that it can be used as a GPU and a PPU while still doing CPU calcs while the 360 is unable to do this. While xbox fans might say that the graphics card is better in the 360 then the ps3 this just isnt true its just easier to program for but once again the learner curze is getting smaller and smaller and this does show with killzone 2 and heavy rain plus witht the cell being able to be used as a gpu the ps3 in total is able to be more powerfull in terms of processing and graphics just needs time which is about 5 months until killzone 2 to come outPhazevariance

This is called a "PS3 Fanboy" who doesn't know what he's talking about. I stopped reading at "gears 2 looks like the first one".

As a matter of fact, the two consoles have very different archetectures. 360 has a cpu and ram that communicate between the two, ps3 has cell which is made up of a few chips, and each chip has its own chunk of ram so it can complete functions faster in small, but reassembling them takes more time and it ends up being about the same for speed, except it can process more things at the same time than 360. THe problem with that is that it is harder to program code for a game to split and reassemble liek that as opposed to making it like you would for a PC (and 360).

It has nothign to do with "learner curve" as thats just uneducated BS that the guy above posted about. In the end, the ps3 has less total ram, and that ends up cutting into the texture quality of games, where the 360 has only dvd which cuts into the content quantity available per disc, which cuts on quality of other aspects of the game. They can always go multi disc, but that incurs a larger fee/royalty to the developer which eats away at their profit margins.

shoeman22 has no idea what he is talking about, he sounds like a 10 year old trying to piece together information on something he has no clue about, so don't take fanboyish comments like that as truth.

Nice reply dude.Good to see some one with knowledge over here.

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="-Hoax-"][QUOTE="lesner87"]

[QUOTE="-Hoax-"]At one point i thought i was REAL! the mouth movements are a bit off but neverless it looks really cool-Hoax-

Yes they worked on it...The new character seems to be good.

Where the mans chasing the woman with the knife and im pretty sure this will be a day one buy for me ive been waiting for a game like this to come out im get bored of all the FPS games

Same here.Thanks to this title i will finally enjoy something NEW and unqiue.

No havent heard of it.I am waiting for FC2,LBP and this.I have always loved games where you make your decisions and create your own things.GTA IV was good too !

Spore was geting all this praise too-- then it floped.

* It didn't get AAA

* The sales are mediocre

Its great that Sony wants to introduce a new IP-- but, this isn't the new Madden or Halo. Little boys a many are out playing with plastic guns and chucking a football-- not at home playing dress up with rag dolls. Its a fact-- deal with it!

Its polite to say nice things, especially about something that isn't even completed or out yet.

The game kind of reminds me of the hype around Psychonauts!

elpoep

Theres a difference between a PC title and Console title.

[QUOTE="gagit811"]the game is not a real time game. its more of a movie with press X to do this at that time. but it does look good.bigblunt537

Yes i was gonna say the same thing.But i guess you filled the space.

[QUOTE="lesner87"]

[QUOTE="-Hoax-"]At one point i thought i was REAL! the mouth movements are a bit off but neverless it looks really cool-Hoax-

Yes they worked on it...The new character seems to be good.

Where the mans chasing the woman with the knife and im pretty sure this will be a day one buy for me ive been waiting for a game like this to come out im get bored of all the FPS games

Same here.Thanks to this title i will finally enjoy something NEW and unqiue.