Best Boss:  Goron Patriarch  (I know he was easy, but they all were!)

Best Dungeon:  Temple of Time (I just loved the atmosphere.)

Worst Boss:  Big Spider (A nice combination of too-easy and not-fun.)

Worst Dungeon:  City in the Sky (Loved the atmosphere, hated the level.)

[QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="hotplayer220"]

Wait up everyone....

Some of you may have noticed that Diddy Kong Racing was released for DS just recently. If I remember correctly Rare was part of that games development (N64 version) too if I'm not mistaken. So WTF? If they can get rights to that then I'm sure getting them done for Goldeneye is a possibility.

Generic_Dude

thats only because Microsoft is in the handheld market, and it wont hurt them in any way.  but they have competition in the console market, as well as the ever more popular "Virtual Console Market"

Microsoft and Rare aren't the same company... Microsoft is the owner of the majority of Rare's stock, which simply means that Rare has an obligation to keep that company happening. But that doesn't mean Rare is tied to making MS only products. Donkey Kong is a Nintendo-owned license. MS has absolutely no stake in Donkey Kong... Nintendo pays Rare a buttload of money to make those games, which eventually gets filtered to MS (as a shareholder). Given that games like Diddy Kong Racing don't sell well on MS platforms, it's no big loss to MS. In fact, this is one of those rare situations where everybody wins. MS makes mad money, Nintendo makes mad money and Rare makes mad money. The only one not getting a piece of the action is Sony... and who cares about them?

What many people here seem to forget is that companies are in the business of making money. Even Nintendo. If it gets to a point where Nintendo would lose money by putting Goldeneye on VC, then there's no way they'd do it. Same with MS... because they'd have to pay a sum to a few companies themselves. Everybody owns a little piece of this game and it's doubtful that we'll ever see it again in its original form. I would, admittedly, love to see it hit Xbox Live -- because MS would add online multiplayer. But on the realistic end of things, people, don't get your hopes up for Goldeneye 64 on the VC. Sad, but true.

how bout u be a real gamer and finish the game yourself. you really owe it to the devs because it is a masterpiecebofe1234

[QUOTE="nvs22"][QUOTE="littlefugue"][QUOTE="chris3116"]

My Predictions

Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link
Donkey Kong Country
Streets of Rage

bofe1234

Are you kidding? its amazing how people cant grasp this concept. Shigeryu Miyamoto made Star fox for the snes and was licenced by nintendo. nintendo has the rights. When nitnendo wanted one for the n64 they asked rare to make it (did rare even develope it) (o well i dont remember and it doesnt matter). anyway when nintendo asked rare to make it. they did. they in no way have the star fox rights. they just developed it. Goldeye was a rare property not nintendos same as banjo. they arent nintendo characters. they are rares and they have the rights to those games. although now EA has the goldeneye rights so yah.

not realy at the most 1200 credits and anyone in thier right mind with points would buy it so they would make money!clarkeyboy21

[QUOTE="littlefugue"][QUOTE="chris3116"]

My Predictions

Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link
Donkey Kong Country
Streets of Rage

nvs22

but everyone agrees  that if they were to 'negotiate' and get all the rights they would make a large nt profit! as it is the best game on the 64clarkeyboy21