lolfaqs' forum posts

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

The board members of BDA vote on each license application. Sony has a seat on the board, but they get one vote like everyone else on the board.

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

[QUOTE="-Melix-"]

[QUOTE="rybe1025"]Unless it is free I will not bother with it. Now that I have most of the ribbons it has lost a lot of its thrill.urdead18

guaranteed its not going to be free buddy

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-310300.aspx

el oh el

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

*sigh* why do lemmings keep doing this to themselves? They say its an exclusive now but when its announced for the PS3 they'll back out trying to say "bu bu but.. it was a timed exclusive!" or "bu bu but.. we already played it, cows just want our leftovers"

Theres absoloutely no reason for it to be exclusive. Maybe timed but then again, why would Microsoft want LP2 timed when there millions of other better games.

shutdown_202

You forgot the "uh, obviously it's multiplat. No one hyped it as an exclusive."

XD

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

i believe you 100%, especially with that informative link

emorainbo

I lol'd

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

I loved MM on NES and DotT on PC. I want to see an HD sequel for PS3. ^_^

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

Who will be the first to 200?! =)

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

yup, the Xbox division finally turned a profit in 2008 for the first time ever since the Xbox division was created god knows how long ago.

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

Oh and the source for that Business Week article isn't even sure if PS3 is still sold at a loss. They're speculating. Furthermore:

Having sold the PS3 at a loss for its entire life span so far, iSuppli says, Sony may reach the break-even point with the PS3 in 2009, and start turning a profit on the consoles after that. "Every time we do a teardown, it's sort of backward-looking," says iSuppli analyst Andrew Rassweiler. "Sony is one step ahead of us and probably has plans to re-spin the hardware to reduce the costs yet again," he says.

So they really are just pulling numbers out of no where for 2009.

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

Congratulations, 360, you actually outsold the PS2 this week! :)

Avatar image for lolfaqs
lolfaqs

1776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 lolfaqs
Member since 2009 • 1776 Posts

[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Not enough, at least. From Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_technology "Having sold the PS3 at a loss for its entire life span so far, iSuppli says, Sony may reach the break-even point with the PS3 in 2009, and start turning a profit on the consoles after that." Dec. 23, 2008.IronBass

Nice, so it's on track to make a profit within 3 years of release just like the 360.

Yup. If it actually happens, will be good news for Sony. And with that was my point proven right.

Actually you disproved your point, because your argument is narrow-sighted and doesn't look at costs as they go down.