wow you really enjoyplaying games dont you...
the gametrailers comparison is the fairest ive seen and the ps3's air looks way better because it looks thick but 360 has darker lighting.
if you buy games because of framerates anyway theyres something up.

k-diddy66

DiRT has much better graphics on 360, but runs smoother on P3 because of the dumbed down graphics. Which version would you get if given away for free?

"ba ba ba Microspot :cry:" -Cow

STFU, it's going to score the same on both consoles

"I have yet to play a next-gen action/adventure game"

You must be a Hermit :lol:

"I have yet to play a next-gen action/adventure game"

You must be a Hermit :lol:

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Cali3350"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

the 360 has the power of a BUGET gaming pc. a 8600gt is slightly more powerfull the the 360 and is dirt cheap. any dual core cpu leaves the x360 in the dust and can be had for a bout $50. to match the 360 cost very little but to have a highend gaming pc that destorys ps3 and x360 combined cost maybe $200

True_Gamer_

I have a 8600GT.

Is it slightly more powerful than my 360 from my experience?

-shakes head- Not from the games I play.

Since devolepers only have to work with one hardware with the 360 they will of course look better

That's what I'm saying.

I'm sure if the devs only worked with a 8600gt they could do some real miracles.

That's the downside of developing for a PC.

Run your games at 1280*720 like the 360 (Though some games run even lower) and youll find that 8600GT does very well.

I bet World in Conflict ends up running better on 360 than it does with a 8600GT. Keep in mind the benchmarks below is with a 8600GTS, and thats slightly better than a 8600GT

Xbox360=MEDIUM SETTINGS

7600GT=30 fps same as the 360 feels bad for a console fanboy heh?

I don't think so fanboy. 360 has performance more inline with a X1950XT.

So youre saying that the 360 will deliver same settings that the X1950XT has? Same deph field? Nope not enough RAM... Same textures? Nope not enough VRAM... Also while the vertical resolution of 720p is low compared to 1024 of the PC setting...

I'm saying World in COnflict on 360 will be equal to a 1950XT on High Settings and about 30FPS

A 7600GT can't run Bioshock at high settings with VSync on and 30FPS. Not even close. A X1950 however can.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]PS3 unless you have a DX10 cardimprezawrx500

I don't know if PS3 can outperform a 7800GT, but 360 definatley can. PS3 probably can too.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Cali3350"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

the 360 has the power of a BUGET gaming pc. a 8600gt is slightly more powerfull the the 360 and is dirt cheap. any dual core cpu leaves the x360 in the dust and can be had for a bout $50. to match the 360 cost very little but to have a highend gaming pc that destorys ps3 and x360 combined cost maybe $200

True_Gamer_

I have a 8600GT.

Is it slightly more powerful than my 360 from my experience?

-shakes head- Not from the games I play.

Since devolepers only have to work with one hardware with the 360 they will of course look better

That's what I'm saying.

I'm sure if the devs only worked with a 8600gt they could do some real miracles.

That's the downside of developing for a PC.

Run your games at 1280*720 like the 360 (Though some games run even lower) and youll find that 8600GT does very well.

I bet World in Conflict ends up running better on 360 than it does with a 8600GT. Keep in mind the benchmarks below is with a 8600GTS, and thats slightly better than a 8600GT

Xbox360=MEDIUM SETTINGS

7600GT=30 fps same as the 360 feels bad for a console fanboy heh?

I don't think so fanboy. 360 has performance more inline with a X1950XT.

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="Lonelynight"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

the 360 has the power of a BUGET gaming pc. a 8600gt is slightly more powerfull the the 360 and is dirt cheap. any dual core cpu leaves the x360 in the dust and can be had for a bout $50. to match the 360 cost very little but to have a highend gaming pc that destorys ps3 and x360 combined cost maybe $200

Cali3350

I have a 8600GT.

Is it slightly more powerful than my 360 from my experience?

-shakes head- Not from the games I play.

Since devolepers only have to work with one hardware with the 360 they will of course look better

That's what I'm saying.

I'm sure if the devs only worked with a 8600gt they could do some real miracles.

That's the downside of developing for a PC.

Run your games at 1280*720 like the 360 (Though some games run even lower) and youll find that 8600GT does very well.

I bet World in Conflict ends up running better on 360 than it does with a 8600GT. Keep in mind the benchmarks below is with a 8600GTS, and thats slightly better than a 8600GT

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]Both, i have about 20 Blu-ray movies and 20 HD DVD's ArisShadows

Thats the problem, you got two which opposing different movies and you are forced to buy two seperate formats if you want all your movies.

As Reggie would say "Not my problem"