BLOPS has a nice plot. The campaign from COD games are way better than multiplayer.

So has uncharted 2.

Bad plot is modern warfare 2, its laughable.

[QUOTE="markko84"]

I have a E7500 and used to have a 9800GT (fried 3 days ago, next week i'm buying a 450 GTS) and BC2 ran with High Details, High textures, High Special Effects, High Shadows and 1333x768 resolution, AF16x (AF on this game didn't gave any fps diference, be it 0 or 16x) with no AA and no HBAO with average 55-70 fps, even more depending on the map. Even with your powerful card, if you're trying to run on 1920x1080 you'll get yourself a bottleneck because of the C2D. If you do play like this, low the resolution, so you can crank up details and even AA and get a smooth fps. My rig is worse than yours and I managed to get a smooth gameplay with some detail quality. But if you feel the necessity to play on the monitor native resolution, there's nothing I can say.

For me, textures, details and AF are more important than resolution or AA.

jedikevin2

Markko.. You would do better getting a AMD 5770 then a gts 450.. the gts 450 is fairly bad for the price... Here is a quick suggestion.. Here

thanks for your tip mate, 'ill check out

[QUOTE="markko84"]

and I agree

dice could make the game uses better the core2duo.. my processor even being old its way better than those of current consoles, so if xbox 360 and ps3 can play bf3 with whatever detail settings on 720p, my rig can too.

i5750at4Ghz

so, you're saying that, running games, the PS3 and Xbox360 processor are better than a E7500 or E8400?

(i'm asking, because I really don't know)

best plataform game ever.

better than mario, DK..

must have classic.

Sonic 3 combined with sonic knuckles its a masterpiece.

and I agree

dice could make the game uses better the core2duo.. my processor even being old its way better than those of current consoles, so if xbox 360 and ps3 can play bf3 with whatever detail settings on 720p, my rig can too.

[QUOTE="markko84"]

Processor wise

the engine is the same

why ps3/xbox 360 processors will handle the game, but a 1.7 C2D won't, for example?

all the diferences betwenn PC version and ports will be graphic details, filtering (aa and anisotropic), resolutions and all.

I doubt that a C2D 1.7 with a mid range VGA won't play BF3 in 720p on everything on LOW.

feel free to correct me if i'm wrong

Mystic-G

I have a E7500 and used to have a 9800GT (fried 3 days ago, next week i'm buying a 450 GTS) and BC2 ran with High Details, High textures, High Special Effects, High Shadows and 1333x768 resolution, AF16x (AF on this game didn't gave any fps diference, be it 0 or 16x) with no AA and no HBAO with average 55-70 fps, even more depending on the map. Even with your powerful card, if you're trying to run on 1920x1080 you'll get yourself a bottleneck because of the C2D. If you do play like this, low the resolution, so you can crank up details and even AA and get a smooth fps. My rig is worse than yours and I managed to get a smooth gameplay with some detail quality. But if you feel the necessity to play on the monitor native resolution, there's nothing I can say.

For me, textures, details and AF are more important than resolution or AA.

Processor wise

the engine is the same

why ps3/xbox 360 processors will handle the game, but a 1.7 C2D won't, for example?

all the diferences betwenn PC version and ports will be graphic details, filtering (aa and anisotropic), resolutions and all.

I doubt that a C2D 1.7 with a mid range VGA won't play BF3 in 720p on everything on LOW at least on 30 fps.

feel free to correct me if i'm wrong

In BC2, all the guns that had to be nerfed, were nerfed. So no "overpowered blah" thing on that game.

HL3 And PGR5.Vaultl101egend

bizarre creations is dead

unless you're expecting some lame-ass third party developer to make the next game

The last good nintendo console was the SNES.

The nintendo 64 was the start of the downfall.. release a cartridge console on mid nineties was one of the most stupidiest ideas ever conceivied on console history. Not satisfied, their next console is released again with a catch - mini dvd.

most nintendo's library are full of kid/family games, nintendo don't want to focus on a powerful hardware because they don't think its not needed. They do not care for the hardcore gamer, so i'll do the same and not care for then.