matteld2006's forum posts

Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
I can almost guarantee NIBRIS was the dev on Sadness, and Frontline was the publisher, the game still exists, but without a pub, it won't go anywhere.Shermit


...Frontline wasn't the publisher...
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Sigh, I would wait for an official announcement that the game will never come out before striking it out. We DON'T know how big of a part Frontline played in the development of Sadness. Nibris also still has Digital Amigos to help them develop it. I'm not saying that it is certain to come out, but it just seems that you guys are taking the easy way of denial rather than the tougher path of hope.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts

[QUOTE="GatoFeo"]Every time I see Blue-ray against Hd-Dvd, theres always dvd>>>>>>>> Both (especially Blue-Ray) People just don't see that Blue-ray did A WHOLE ALOt BETTER than dvd format when it first came out. (FACT) And it's expected to replace dvd in the next three years. So plp, the dvd is going bye bye for years to come. Just to point out for plp who don't know this. :)elementz28

When millions of more people start buyin high definition tv's then blue ray will be the winner ..hddvd is dead already..dvd will be gone but it will be stayin a little longer..

Yes, WHEN they buy high def tvs. As opposed to when DVDs came to the market, people didn't have to buy thousand dollar Tvs to get the most out of it. The Dvd player worked just fine with their current tv. Now with Blue Ray, people HAVE to buy a new tv if they are to get any benefit out of their new $1000 blue ray player (yes it will come down, and no most people will not buy the ps3 as a blue ray player. So there is less incentive to move up to Blue ray as there was to move up to DVD.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Okay... so your point is that Blue Ray (when it came out) is doing better than DVD (when it came out) I don't have any numbers and I doubt you do, so lets just assume you are right. Well, when people say dvd>>>>Blue Ray they are talking about right now, the present, this very second. And they are right, end of thread.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
There is no log in needed. They look the same as they did back then, and I'm pretty sure that both Gamespot and IGN have been reviewing most of the games coming out.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Yes, Nintendo is terrible at manufacturing hardware...they've only been doing it the longest... Also, you gotta recall that the Wii will eventually be coming out in numerous colors. I would hope that they have started making them by now, so that is going to cut into the maximum number of standard colored Wiis they can produce.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Yes, do it. Both games tackle the same quest, so while you wouldn't ruin the first game by playing the second one first, you are missing out on a lot of character development as well as some plot twists here and there. I'm pretty sure you can find the first one pretty cheap off of eBay and the like, you might even be able to find it used at a Gamestop if you're lucky.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Waiiiiiiit a second. So people are hyping this game because of the graphics? I thought it was the physics. Thats what did it for me on the trailer. I couldn't give a bother to whether or not that bridge looked realistic, just give me perfect physics and I'll get excited.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Ok, but considering that it is THEIR console, and it was THEIR idea to implement the new control scheme, shouldn't they have had some kind of game ready to go that was actually designed around their "new way of gaming" when the console launched? Fast Forward to the end of April, 6 months AFTER the console has released, and they still haven't come out with a true gaming title yet that truly adopts the "new way of gaming", as hailed by Nintendo themselves.
QuasidodoJr
You've got to remember that SPM was probably (no I don't know for certain) conceived and planned on the GC. Also, I don't see how well the wii remote would transfer to the game. Do I want to swing the controller every time I want to hit an enemy? In an RPG like this? Definitely not. Just like noone is complaining about lack of wiimotage in Fire Emblem, I'm glad that there isn't anything tacked on.
Avatar image for matteld2006
matteld2006

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 matteld2006
Member since 2003 • 93 Posts
Seriously, if you think you're going to stretch a side-scrolling platformer out for even 21 days, in this day and age, I do believe you are mentally stuck in 1987.QuasidodoJr
Well, the other two Paper Marios lasted 25+ hours. Heck, it took me longer to finish PM2 than it did LoZ: TP. I think that if you strech it out, ~1 hour a day, it should be enough to last all April.