michael098's forum posts

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts

That's a REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY bad picture of Uncharted.

Uncharted blows Fable 2 away graphics wise.

Not that I care.

Relys

Uncharted does not blow Fable 2 away in terms of graphics, saying that makes you as bad as TC, now I'm not saying fable 2 is better but already it is very close and it could possibly look better by release. But far more importantly is what game will be better and if Fable 2 lives up to whats being hyped then i have no doubt it will be the better game, which is what actually matters

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
It looks better than that hideous pic of Killzone 2, FarCry 2 also isn't all its being hyped to be and is laughable that its graphics are being compared to crysis.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts

No, DX10 is an API. It has no graphics.

Is it capable of CGI movie quality? I suppose so if you have hardware powerful enough, but then just about any graphical API could do CGI quality with enough powerful hardware.

Corvin

It allows for more advanced effects though, hes referring to games that support DX10 no the API itself.....

and no hardware available can render CGI quality in real time with enough frames per second for it to be playable, not even close.

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
Games can look more realistic than alot of CG movies, but this is because of the look CG movies are going for, CGI movies like Toy story or finding nemo have far more detail and extremely high poly models. Lighting and other effects are also way to advanced to be done in real-time.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
The most surprising part is its all in real-time. Must be an awesome PC.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
Its good to see its selling well, its a really good game.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
Lol a rainbow 6 game? I have lost all hope for rainbow 6.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

[QUOTE="PCgamingLife"]Crysis looks way betterdotWithShoes

Of course it is! It's a PC game that you need a supercomputer (slight exaggeration) to run!

thought the Ps3 was a 'mini' super computer?

Lol where did you read that?

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts

[QUOTE="darkmagician06"]meh looks bland...also those pics showing you used to show off the character models are cutscenesX_CAPCOM_X
Hahaha! The cutscenes are the same as the gameplay..

I doubt it, they almost always add AA, AF and even more detailed models in cutscenes, but maybe your right.

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

I can answer this question in two ways.

On a purely Technical level, I think Gears of War is still the console graphics king. I loaded the game up last night for the first time in months (the Gears of War 2 teaser made me do it!) and I'm still amazed by the level of graphical detail Epic was able to pull off on the Xbox 360. The textures and character models appear more detailed than those in Uncharted.

Based on artisitic merit, Uncharted wins. It may lack some of the finer detailing that Gears has, but its rich color palette (greens! blues! oranges! oh how I've missed you!) won me over, showing that games do not have to rely solely on color palettes ranging from brown, to gray and back to brown. Uncharted's sweeping vistas are also a treat to look at, striking a stark contrast to Gear's of War's destroyed and barren urban settings.

So, technically, I believe Gears is the graphics king, but only on a purely technical level.

numba1234

The ground textures in uncharted have far more details, the shaders, and textures on walls are far more detailed in uncharted, then in gears of war. I don't see the point of even comparing, Texture wise uncharted utterly destroys every other console game in existance. THe artistic sucks in uncharted. Some of the jungle places look ugly. BUt detail per screen it is unmatched. Look at the broken windows, look at the broken ruins. The details in uncharted are the most I've ever seen. It has more detail then Crysis, more detail then any otehr game period.

I'll even go and pics, of how mcuh more detail uncharted has then Gears of war. Pleasse don't compare the graphical detail in these games. Because gears of war had terrible ground textures.


The screens as promised! 56k SUICIDE!!!

















As I'm going to say, this game may not techincally be the best(it has to be for ps3, but Crysis is techincally better), but detail wise, yes this game has the most details. MOre then crysis, and more then any other game.

Uncharted looks great but why say it has more detail then crysis? cause it doesn't.