[QUOTE="bingbaocao"]

[QUOTE="aflakian"]

Honestly, what does the 360 have that's new for '09 that we didn't already know was coming?
We already knew about Forza 3, ODST, and Splinter Cell (fiscal year).
Left 4 Dead 2 was the only surprise.
With that said however, the 360's 2010 is looking a lot better.

aflakian

Well Splinter Cell won a lot of E3 awards, ODST looks great, and Forza 3 looks like a good game for racing fans.

2010 DOES look better for the 360 with Mass Effect 2, Crackdown 2, Halo: Reach, and Alan Wake. And maybe Natal.

It'll NEVER go to consoles. Quote me if you want.aaronmullan

Would it really hurt you if it did though?

Nope, my opinion has been that the 360 is awesome, and still it.

Though my opinion has changed on the PSP, now instead of hating it I really want one now. Just not a PSP GO!

Why would you want to play D3 on consoles? SAGE_OF_FIRE

Why not? Sacred 2 was pretty OK on consoles.

Halo Reach is a prequel to Halo CE, the story is supposed to be darker and the game play will be changed some what. SAGE_OF_FIRE

That really hasn't been confirmed yet, and we probably won't hear about it until next E3.

I would buy it if it came out on consoles.

Maybe, who knows?

This constant MGS4 talk just about if it's going to the 360 or not is kinda' getting boring, so let's just wait and see.

Sigma 2 also has HORRIBLE looking blood :lol:

Why on earth wouyld you tone down NG?:lol:

kozzy1234

I wonder...are they trying to go for a 'T' rated game?

I would make more sense, get those depressed 15 year olds, add in some Linkin Park as the theme song for Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, and you got a hit!

If they aren't going to get a 'T' rated game, and still a 'M' game, then I don't see the point.

You got a point. If I have to pay separately for the extra contents in GTA4, I don't think it should be consider as extra for the game. Anyway, I justify a game being exclusive or not by the experience I gain from playing the game. If the experience with playing Sigma is vastly different than the one on 360, it should be classified as exclusive, otherwise, It shouldn't be.hoplayletsplay

I agree.

Yet the developers have been saying that there's going to be new bosses, levels, 3 characters, and co-op. Also better controls.

Co-Op adds another side to things, and if the controls are indeed better and if the enemy AI is balanced it would be a vastly different experience compared to the first Ninja Gaiden 2...At least that's what the developers say. Is that enough new content to justify it as a exclusive in terms of raw improvements/ add-on content?

[QUOTE="millwrought"]

[QUOTE="hoplayletsplay"]I don't consider Ninja Gaiden for the 360 as exclusive, however, the same thing applies to Sigma. It's essentially a copy of Ninja Gaiden with exclusive contents. So although it has exclusive contents, that doesn't make it a different game from the original one. Take GTA4 as example, the 360 one has exclusive contents but the game itself isn't exclusive. Fair enough?cainetao11

Bad example IMO, GTA4 exclusive stuff is all DLC ADD-ONS. Not stuff that comes out of the box, therefore isn't available to everyone. Same with Bioshock, the PS3 version got some add-on stuff just I believe it was all DLC.

To date it sounds like all of the new stuff for Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 is in the box, ready to go.

I understand your point though.

That's still seperate from the main game itself.