@No_Hablo_Ingles: Exactly. I know I've been known to go on "anti-Jordan" rants, but it's really anti Jordan hype, can't stand it. Why, because I view myself as a true and long time fan of the pro game. It's just not right for past (and present) greats to have their skills, accomplishments and era diminished in order to hold up all-things MJ as "The Greatest", especially since there is no such thing.
If other greats like Oscar Robertson or Jabbar speak out against the MJ hype some view them as bitter or jealous. I don't blame them, with what they and others brought to the game in their era's they shouldn't have to take a back seat to Jordan. Why do current great players have to win 6 rings to be compared to MJ? Why is his 6 the standard and not Russell's 11? Why should I be overly impressed with MJ's defensive player of the year award when one article I read said Alcindor/Jabbar should have won 3 of them but the award didn't exist at the time (another reason the comparisons are ridiculous and unfair).
I think the "next Jordan" has already come and is almost gone, Kobe. Kobe was the new breed of player. Just like MJ added better shooting and tough defense to what Dr. J brought to the game, Kobe added 3pt shooting, and an amazing array of shot making ability/ball handling/foot work...etc. I agree with Phil Jackson, who agreed that Kobe was more skilled or talented than MJ. It doesn't mean the accomplishments will the same or greater, too many different circumstances. Now Lebron's size, court vision/play making, defensive versatility has added something else.
I look forward to who's next and what they will add, but much of what I hear is ..."he ain't Jordan". Jordan doesn't help with his periodic comments about today's game and players and how he could do this or that........and people slurp it up like he came down from heaven with some great decree.........yeah, it's tough to like him.
Log in to comment