Getaway was ahead of its time and had some great, immersive elements. The healing by leaning against something, much better than the cod health we get now. Realistic open world and not cartoony GTA style. You could also go into buildings when you couldn't in GTA. Real actors and motion capture. Taking hostages. It also had a lot of problems.

RARE was one of the most consistent devs of the 90s though. Amazing. Level design, graphics, gameplay, music, art. RIP.

Just sell the console rights to sony and keep the gambling rights for yourselves. They already have team silent who made siren, they made the best castlevania game since the 90s with From in Bloodborne, MGS has strong ties to their brand and I'd love to see MGS4.5 with the fox engine as I much preferred it to the shallow MGS5 single player.

I don't see anyone else being able to do right by those franchises.

Reviewers were blinded by MGS5, which was a pretty strong game for the first 1/3 of it then it hits a wall. No way they actually finished the game before forcing their reviews out. Mad Max is very underrated and I appreciate it more after playing MGS5.

If the maps are well designed, this could be something special.

PC keeps getting beaten by PS4 which hasn't even been out 2 years.

Joke thread? Or are you really detached from reality? People are already portbegging for those "irrelevant" games from the conference.

A lot of these games are very niche or glorified mods and aren't even up to Socom 2 standards. The budget it would take to market this on console would dwarf what they spent making the game.

A socom1/2 remake on ps4 would probably outsell all of the games you listed. The audience is there, but the standards are high since there's been a ton of broken promises.

I don't think you are denying that steam games often sell more when they are on sale. Every time there was a sale I saw it posted on this forum and people posting about how it was time to buy. I don't know any PC friends who bought Dark Souls 1 at full price, and you hear on this forum the reasons why. The situation was a bit better for DS2, of course. I would like to know the exact figure as well, however. I've seen charts for other titles. I'd like to know how many people bought the game dirt cheap and never even went passed the character creator.

SImple economics. Most of the series' base is on playstation, some people here are obviously in denial about that. From Software, the creators, recognize where their base is and signed a multi-year, multi-game deal with Sony. They wouldn't have done that if the majority of their base was elsewhere. It's fine that the series is doing good on PC as well, but the reality is that it still sells better on Playstation and does so when it's priced higher(Launch for example)= more revenue.

Dark souls 2 was the only souls game on PC? You know better than that. Stop wasting everyone's time with your deceptive arguments. Good bye.

The only way to track that is to contact each store and see if they sould through their stock. Or send representatives to look at shelves. There is no international one size fit's all infrastructure that keeps track of each copy in every store. It's much easier to count shipped as sold, which is why everyone does it.

This argument was settled on SW like at the beginning of last generation. And people are still bringing it up?