Blu-Ray or HD-DVD quality > XBL HD movies by far.SpruceCaboose

I agree, right now it is. I think the highest quality is 720p. But, if they focus on it instead of the meadia the quality could be the same. The only thing media is good for is storage,and the occasional coaster if the disc is too damaged, so move the storage to the hard drive instead of the disc. On top of that it would cost the consumer less money cause you cut out the costs of shipping, mass production, and the retailer marking it up. Cheaper with same quality.

Okay so its nothing new that Blu-ray won the media battle. Hurray!!! Now everyone can buy with confidence knowing full well that the disc they buy and the machine they buy will not become a Laserdisc (poor suckers who bought that). But here is where Microsoft can go with this. They can A) Make a Blu-ray add on. B) Make their system Blu-ray just like the PS3..and yes it would still play all 360 titles because Blu-ray drives can read the format...and no Microsoft would not have to switch media type for programing games because that would alienate the mass consumer who already bought one. C) Make the XBL downloads of movies for purchase instead of rentals...thus who cares about media you get same quality only on your hard drive with no disc.

In my opinion I think C would be the best choice for M$. You dont worry about shipping costs, production costs, just download and own it and play it whenever you want. Plus people would be buying the much larger hard drive (120g) instead of a player and M$ would still get their money. If they wanted to they could release a much larger hard drive for the system and then space wouldn't be an issue. The reason Blu-ray won the media war is studio support...not that it was superior to HD..same quality of 1080p and 7.1 surround. But MS has all the studio support on XBL like Disney, WB, etc. So why waste your time with buying another add-on?? Go downloads MS dont make 360 owners buy ANOTHER addon...

Your thoughts on this??

Owner of 360, PS3, PSP, Wii, DS and a semi decent PC ;)

Hey u locked ma other thread :cry:

I predict AA, and i will make a bet on it some time

therealmcc0y

Lol....wasn't the original a AAA title?? Why would this only be a AA....have faith my son. It would take an epic flop of developing to make this title fail...which I highly doubt.

[QUOTE="100Gamer"][QUOTE="biggamerhk"][QUOTE="Shift05"][QUOTE="biggamerhk"][QUOTE="Shift05"]

Everybody can play this game.

Heavenly sword: frame rate issues, and screen tearing at times, dumb AI.

Uncharted:small environments, strong textures (not as great as gears) but had to sacrifice character models to do so.

Lair: glitches, frame rate issues, screen tearing, and a plethora of other problems

GT: great car models but had to sacrifice damage, physics, and backgrounds (2d trees).

This must mean the the PS3 is very weak as well.

biggamerhk

:lol: uncharted .. . small envirnoments!!! lol and yeah actually the textures are awesome in uncharted you'd be surprised

Uncharted textures are not as great as gears of war, and the character models are far from it. In most PS3 exclusives I always see a trade off between great character models with average textures, or great textures with poor character models. Example MGS4 great character models, but average textures on everything else. As well Uncharted is far more linear then what was believed before release. Its only 8-12 hours proving this.

try heavenly sword--great character models, beautiful textures. and uncharted has both amazing character models and textures. its a simple fact. sorry.

heavenly flop is 6 hours long :lol:

we arent talking about length. you just sound like a desperate fakeboy to me . . .

Thats funny I was thinking the exact same thing....but it was about you....:shock:

So, ummm.... What exactly are you playing now? Since the PS3 barely has any decent games. Or should i ask, what exactly are you WATCHING?krp008

LMAO!! Exactly, I like to watch Pirates Trilogy and 300 mostly on my PS3. I do play the occasional game....lets see the last game I played was......uh.....hmmm.....uh.....ooooh got it.....Resistance Fall of Man.

[QUOTE="white45e"]thats funny cause all of those games are better then anything the ps3 has..biggamerhk

nope, i dont think so. you're just a fanboy :)

LMAO!!!!! Only a Sony fanboy would have an avatar like yours. Even intelligent Sony system owners know that game sucked. And you scream fanboy at someone else???:roll:

Don't you have to own a PS3 in order to be a cow?HaloRainbowPuke

No because then the cow population wouldn't be that big. Not many PS3's have been sold....:lol:

Actually not really...I have all three but to be a cow there are signs....like random bashing of a system that is obviously amazing. Mine still works and has since launch. Another sign is the fact that this is a Mass Effect thread and you used it as an opportunity to bash the system its on.

Oh but wait you already started a thread bashing the 360 at this very moment and state in it that you wish you would have bought a PS3.....

Put that together equals C O W......so mooo to you pal.

[QUOTE="darkmario123"]

PS3 has the worst games, the worst software attach-rate, and is the worst selling console everywhere (including Japan). Cows will say "just wait" but things just keep getting worse and worse for the PS3.

I think it's now safe to declare PS3 a worthless flop.

nippon_gamer

I think the ps3 sold about 200 times more systems in jpan than the 360.

Link?? Source?? Proof?? Also 200 times more is ridiculous....that would mean the 360 only sold 20,000 units in japan. Considering the PS3 is at about 4 million WORLD WIDE not japan I think you can see the flaw in your math....but who said cows could do math anyway. I sure wont hold you to that standard ....mooo.

Having said that the PS3 is not a worthless flop. I enjoy my Blu Ray player that sometimes is used for a gaming system....