navyguy21's comments

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Wow Gamespot, just wow.

This place is slowly sinking

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@grasu: PC players Id imagine want the 64bit exe file which can access more RAM. This has several benefits. Running smoother, faster loads, better mod support and compatibility, etc.

Downside is for console players who have already played since they have to pay full price and its only 40 on PC.

This version is a lot better because of the lighting model, optimized engine, better mod tools, and can use more RAM.

Its just a better modding platform, game is just a bonus.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

About time! Been waiting to play until patch

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@fallkan: I was referring to current PS4 games. Games like Bloodborne, Witcher 3, Fallout 4 have serious frame rate issues and just the base PS4 Pro will at least get to a stable 30.

I agree with you that Sony should work with publishers and developers to find ways to encourage them to patch games. I think it is a moronic move to just have the mandate going forward because games are released far less frequently as they were in previous gens.

If I were Sony i would eat the patch costs for devs and possibly waive certification fees for games released within the last 2 years. That would encourage those devs to do it.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Im getting a PS4 Pro for better frame rates on all of the games i currently have.

I absolutely hate low or choppy frame rates and PS4/XB1 struggle to run current games at a stable frame rate.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Edited By navyguy21

I went with the GTX 1080.

After experimenting with SLI for a couple of years I decided that the headaches were not worth the trouble. Decided to go with a single card to ease my mind. The 1080 should max any game for at least the next 3 years. I have a GTX 970 SLI system if anyone is interested.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@kyelo: Because they dont have compelling reasons to buy the hardware. Period.

Wii was a compelling console while most people thought WiiU was a Wii add on like the Wii Fit.

Its about marketing.

Im not sure what hardware sales have to do with the TYPE of software put on a system though.

Gamecube only sold 24 million but had some of the best games of that gen.

Wii sold tons and had great games.

WiiU is getting great games.

Those gems sold millions on a platform with low install bases. The experiences matter.

I feel like you keep looking at this from the Sony/Microsoft business model. It wont work with Nintendo.

Wii U didnt sell well because of how it was marketed. (Not well at all)

If they use the same hype model for the Wii it wouldve been fine. Its a great console. (controller is clunky though)

I think the new system will be marketed properly

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Edited By navyguy21

@kyelo: Your logic is why those 3rd parties STOP putting games on the systems. Ive been a Nintendo gamer all my life, since the original NES release in 85. Third party games dont sell because most Nintendo gamers are looking for the Nintendo-like experience. That is fun games with creativity, great (and functional) gameplay, top quality production values. Problem is, most high profile games dont bother perfecting these elements. They can patch games later and sell you DLC.

Nintendo has ALWAYS had a very high standard for gameplay quality and this is what the Ninty fan base expects. On top of that, Ninty consoles are almost always sold at a profit so they dont need to rely on software sales to make a profit. 3rd parties do. Games would sell on Nintendo consoles if they created experiences that are more creative, with a higher production standard than they currently have. Nintendo owners dont want ports, we want unique and creative experiences. Games like Viva Pinata, LBP, Tearaway, EA's Create, Blink series from back in the day, Psychonauts, Uncharted etc. all would do well on nintendo consoles. Madden, Call of Duty, Batman, Halo, Dark Souls.........wouldnt.

Ports dont work, Vita/PSP proved that also. DS/3DS succeeds because of the experiences.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Why do 3rd parties continue to say this about every Nintendo console and then dont put games on it?

Your games fail on Nintendo because we dont want the same third party games on Nintendo hardware as we do on PS4/XB1.

Put some creative, Nintendo-esque games on the platform and theyll sell.

Back up that support with some real support, not real ports.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

70

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Edited By navyguy21

This is why I love PC gaming. I've been playing them at 1440p at 60fps...with texture mods....for a while now.