http://ps3.ign.com/articles/782/782476p1.html

Simply put, PS3 can't hold a candle to the visuals found in Microsoft land. Especially considering the handful of bugs that have dead soldiers getting stuck in walls and twitching on the floor. The detailed environments and clear draw distances aren't found on PS3. If you had never seen the other versions of F.E.A.R., you still wouldn't be impressed with the PS3's graphics, but compared to the PC and 360, this version is graphically dead in the water.

Xenos > RSX confirmed

FEAR PS3 = 8.1

FEAR 360/PC = 9.1+

Pretty surprising since the PS3 version got a few more years of Dev time...

wok7

360 FEAR = 8.6

And if devs started on PS3, it would be easier to port to 360, meaning ports would be pretty much the exact same. And all Ubi games are made better on the 360. 

No, No, and No.

Try Toy Story quality, and even then, it fails when it comes to texture, shadowing and anti-aliasing of Toy Story.

hamumu

Toy Story doesn't need Anti-aliasing because the screens are pre-rendered..... 

Banjo Kazooie for the 360 will be on the same level, probably even more so than Racthet and Clank for the PS3Mkavanaugh77

Facts? Oh wait, I'm on system wars. 

360 will have the lead in 2008 - and thats what is importantvickissv2

Nice facts to back up your statement. 

I thought you already could play ps1 games on a ps3?driftingsilvia

Yea but what about the games you sold or never owned. I'm taking this oppurtunity to hopefully play Metal Gear Solid 1. 

[QUOTE="Knewl2"]So noone has anything to say about this game except graphics? When will people stop caring what in game trees look like? Anything good about the game itself to make people buy it?akatsuki0wn3d

People who dont care about graphics play wii, not PS3/360

INO RITE?