nparks' comments

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

Nintendo's new slogan: "Welcome to the social". No, wait.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

The XBox companion app on the Windows 8 Release Preview is pretty weak, but maybe that's because they're working on something better.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

@roguebot @deathstream

The list exaggerates the issue because it confounds developers with publishers. Bungie and Respawn won't be there, but Activision and EA, their publishers, will be. The industry is dominated by publishers and platform vendors, not developers. That's not just the case for E3. Valve and Blizzard would rather pretend that consoles don't exist, and E3 has become more console-centric, again in line with the development of the overall industry, so their absence is also understandable.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

@Ninjiz

tl;dr

Summary: Superman always wins because he has every possible power to the nth degree. He can punch time so hard that it breaks the fabric of the universe and makes it so Batman was never born. That's also why Superman's not a very interesting character, outside of continuity altering cleanup events, and why Batman kicks Supes' heiny when it comes to the most important match: box office gross.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

Holding out hope for Ambush Bug, personally.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

"Art", when applied to other media is often a defensive term meaning generally "pointless and totally devoid of entertainment value."

(Example: Reviewer: "That movie made no sense. It had no plot or character development." Director: "You just don't get it. It's 'art'.")

Flow fits that definition at least as well as any game in recent memory.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

More Bayonetta. Fewer crummy Sonic games.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

@inaka_rob, that's probably one of the reasons I don't play much COD. All I'm saying is that Halo 2 was a massive leap forward from the original in terms of the variety and depth of the single player campaign. It introduced a ton of new enemies. I'm hoping for a similarly large leap here because since Halo 2, the single player campaigns have largely stagnated. The gameplay has always been magnificent, but the campaigns since Halo 2 have also been too short as they've shifted focus to the multiplayer and none of them saw the leap in gameplay and storytelling that we saw in Halo 2. They don't need to throw out the formula, but it's time to push the envelope. Show the kind of courage behind an RE4 or an Assassin's Creed 3. Promise us something that we've never experienced in a Halo game before. I love Halo. I've played every single one. It's set high standards and expectations, which is why more of the same will not be enough.

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

Elites and grunts again? I was kind of hoping Halo 4 would bring something new. Something different. We've been shooting Covenant and Flood for, what, 5 games now? How many new enemies have we faced since Halo 2? Even Capcom decided in RE4 that maybe they should give the zombies a break. Isn't it time for Halo combat to evolve again?

Avatar image for nparks
nparks

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nparks

So, if the regulation actually passed as worded above, could the ESRB dodge it by just changing their rating letters?