They are hardly the most annoying. Only a select few PC fanboys start topics over why the PC is the best, it's usually some console fanboy who starts an argument. It's not just because if higher resolution either....I found funny how this "article" proclaim that only console fanboys argue over their system while conveniently forgetting that PC fanboys are probably the most annoying of the bunch hiding behind a superiority veil proclaiming that "you just don't get it" because you don't have a billion of pixels on the screen.
madsnakehhh
oldkingallant's forum posts
Then send me Xenoblades and your compatible Wii! :DI haven't played my Wii for about 1,5 years but suddently played it a few hours for Xenoblade ... wasn't worth it IMO
ArchoNils2
[QUOTE="LP4EVA2005"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]thats cause Wii only gamers are casual gamers.. Nice try, buddy. There are people on YouTube who are core wii only gamers such as dazran303. Also, I now a lot of people who are wii only owners that are core gamers. It's ok, there are people different than the different SW user Unquestionably the system with the greatest percentage of casual gamers is the 360. 90% of people who own the console just have it to play Call of Duty online once a year...To Wii only owners: How can you own a Wii and not play anything on PS3 or 360 or PC? How :cry: ??? I see much value in owning a Wii, but not just a Wii.
LastRambo341
Then you're really just stupidly missing out on awesome games. I've already played both extensively, but if I hadn't I'd be playing them constantly. If you truly haven't played them I expect you have no way to criticize them, so why don't you just play them? Either a lie or a very stupid story...Nope, I even got DKCR and SMG2, never touched either game.
WiiMan21
I adamantly defend the Wii, but to be honest, no my PC has taken up every last minute of my time except for the occasional MLB '11 The Show game on the PS3. I do however have Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword (the special bundle with the Zelda Wii Remote Plus) pre-ordered and once it's in my hands the Wii will not get a moment of rest until I've beaten it, and it will probably a very brief rest since I'll pick it up for a 2nd time very quickly.
I'd like to see someone try to justify calling Uncharted, God of War, Resistance, and Ratchet and Clank something new. Uncharted is a complete Tomb Raider rip off, God of War is a standard by the numbers action game, Resistance is a mediocre FPS, and Ratchet and Clank, while the most creative of them all, has been milked more rapidly than any series ever made by Nintendo. No, neither Mario nor Zelda has had series sequels made as frequently as R&C. And as previously mentioned, OoT has been made once. Need help counting that high? Here we go, ready? .... 1. Done. By the way "sandbox" isn't a genre... I also don't understand how Mario, Zelda, and Metroid aren't variety, they're all completely different genres...sony easily they consistanly give you something new whearas nintendo gives to the same old game hell i've lost count of how many times they've "reamade" Ocarina of time. sony has variety from FPS's, to action adventure, to sandbox, plus i like that sony supports some title that are really out there like heavy rain and team ico projects
Ragashahs
Obviously to a fanboy... but someone who actually plays on systems not made by Sony might actually make a different choice. Personally I'd say Nintendo, as nothing Sony has will ever compare to top notch Zelda or Mario games. The fact that you had to list Resistance is hysterical, what a mediocre series...Sony of course
- Uncharted
- Resisitance
- god of War
- Ratchet and clank
- Sly
- infamous
and the list goes on and on. sony has an amazing first party of games
finalstar2007
100 FPS isn't even detectable to the human eye, so that's a bit overboard. Hell the human eye can't detect the difference between 50 and 60 FPS, and anyone who tells you otherwise is fooling themselves. What devs need to do is get all games to 60 FPS (just to make people happy, 40-50 is where differences become almost undetectable, and soon become completely undetectable) and make sure it locks at 60 FPS. The only reason people say they know the difference between 60 and 100 FPS is because if it fluctuates between 60 and 100, you can tell, and it looked pretty drastic. If it's consistent, like real life, it looks more realistic.I would like Battlefield 3/Metro graphics and have devs focus more on higher frame rates. After playing games with 100+ FPS, its really tough to go back to consoles 20-30 FPS
BPoole96
This. 100 times this. This is, simply put, one of the stupidest articles I've ever read. The games aren't even similar!I wonder if IGN ever gets tired of being wrong.
DarkLink77
Log in to comment