@DoomglooM @oldmanstauf @zimerust105 Not really, reviews and standards change over time.

@nintendoman555 @oldmanstauf @DrummerShane12 Are you actually suggesting less than 300 represents a majority?

@zimerust105 With actual NEW content, it may have improved upon the score.

@kambion313 It is an instant classic, I agree and one of my favorites in the series. The original Cube version got a 9.3 on this site! Great score. For a game that is little more than a graphical enhancement, I would think an 8.0 is still a pretty stellar rating. It shouldn't be 10 because its a "remake" of a 10 year old game that has little to no actual new content.

@DrummerShane12 @oldmanstauf And those people who didn't like the art style didn't give it the time of day, They refused to play. Critically, yes, it was always acclaimed and rightfully so. But you obviously forgot all of the complaining back in 2003 when this was released because it didn't look like the E3 demo. It wasn't a "few" people.

I kinda find it funny that there was SO much hate back when this game came out on the Cube and now people are pissed it only got an 8.0 "Great" rating. Make up your minds people.

Wow, never thought a "Great" rating would piss people off so much.

@AlwaysRunning I wouldn't call it a mistake. Off TV play is such a convenience.

@WoodenStick @FAIL_TR0LL The Joke is the value the basic SKU gives when compared to the deluxe. It indeed is a joke.

@Redsyrup @oldmanstauf @GH05T-666 Completely agree with you. And as a result, I think the whole industry will move at a slower pace this next gen. Gaming is not a cheap hobby. Forking out 60 bucks for every knew game is not feasible for many.