@COPMAN221ISBACK @R2C25 I wouldn't call it crap. It's probably a good piece of technology, but certainly nothing I care about.

I guess cool. I for one don't care about live streaming TV and Skype on my console, but I'm sure others will like it.

@Prime_28 @oldmanstauf @darkfiercelink I suppose technically, yes, due to Nintendo's controlling stake in the company. However, they are still a separate entity.

@Prime_28 @darkfiercelink I believe developing X is Monolith's job.

@Queuing_is_back Repurchase is purely a convenience factor. Not a requirement. If you don't want the added functionality, don't pay the extra buck.

@burgo81 @Urizen5 How are users required to purchase the game again?

@Megavideogamer It would seem to make sense, but I'm uncertain if GamePad functionality as well as controller set up and restore point ability would work by just porting over the games.

@BryanParksSuper They're not making anyone buy anything again. Not sure where the misconception is coming from. You can continue to play what you bought for no additional fee.

@marceldelta @oldmanstauf If you buy a VC title on the Wii you can transfer it to the Wii U free of charge and continue to play it there without paying anything extra. What exactly is your complaint? That your copy of Zelda II you bought back in the 80's isn't free to play on the Wii U? Go back and play it on the NES then. You don't have to fork out any more money.

@SirNormanislost Games should ALWAYS be played on their respective consoles, however this service is convenient for some as they may not have the consoles or wish to go back and purchase them. It's also nice to pay a set price for a particular game. Not everyone is a collector and willing to pay going rate for some games.