@Lhomity @oldmanstauf @xxYetterxx What I mean is Nintendo and Sony have not cared to make moves. If it's publishers driving the matter I feel that all the console manufacturers would have done the same. It really comes off as a MS driven initiative especially when they have to build the console with used games in mind.

@Lhomity @obsequies @xxYetterxx @oldmanstauf I won't say they are in the wrong for such a practice, but believe it would be good business sense to make it cheaper.

@Redsyrup @oldmanstauf I never said it was the developers. My comments were actually aimed at MS.

@obsequies @xxYetterxx @oldmanstauf I think I would agree there. Some of the price of retail games goes towards the cost of discs, packaging and printed materials. Since none of that is present in digital, it's a shame they feel the need to charge the same. I'd probably buy more content digitally if there were a price difference.

@Redsyrup @obsequies @xxYetterxx @oldmanstauf 90's games retailed as high as $79. Chrono Trigger for example. SNES and N64 games had no price point.

@Lhomity @oldmanstauf @xxYetterxx Funny how it seems only MS is concerned about the whole matter.

@GH05T-666 I'm sure you probably can, but the buyer may still have to pay a fee to even play it. Hoping this all changes before the release.

@xxYetterxx @oldmanstauf To me it doesn't matter. If MS starts going after eBay and wanting a cut of my profits for selling games I don't like? I think it's wrong. Not saying they will, just an example.

I'm sorry. I know businesses are solely in business to make money and I have no problem with that, but it's absolute greed to want more money off the SAME product that's already been sold to a consumer.

Wow, if that's true, a 24 hour check in, it would be useless to me and others in rural areas.