@KBABZ That's partly why love RPS. Their reviews are labeled rather accurately just, "Wot I think". No numbers, no pretense of authority, just a take on the game.
@KBABZ That's partly why love RPS. Their reviews are labeled rather accurately just, "Wot I think". No numbers, no pretense of authority, just a take on the game.
@SambaLele Basically what KBABZ said. This isn't some sort reviewer's propaganda. All old reviews are kept, and it's not some weighty moral decision to write a new review. If a game is still considered relevant, but has changed enough that two reviews may be better than one, they make another. How in the world is that a bad thing?
@SambaLele Basically what KBABZ said. This isn't some sort reviewer's propaganda. All old reviews are kept, and it's not some weighty moral decision to write a new review. If a game is still considered relevant, but has changed enough that two reviews may be better than one, they make another. How in the world is that a bad thing?
@SambaLele @NeonNinja Uh, no? Take almost any online game that's been around a little while and you'll notice it's changed at least enough to be noteworthy. A several year old review of a F2P game, for example, is largely worthless now.
Gah... Some people just need to see problems wherever they go...
@SambaLele @NeonNinja Uh, no? Take almost any online game that's been around a little while and you'll notice it's changed at least enough to be noteworthy. A several year old review of a F2P game, for example, is largely worthless now.
Gah... Some people just need to see problems wherever they go...
I find this game has more than its share of problems. Not that it's bad, but the only even-handed review I've read was on giantbomb, and that's a bit against the grain for me...
parrot_of_adun's comments