well i ahve:

Uncharted 1

Uncharted 2

Mirror's Edge

Motorstorm

Disgaea 3

MGS4

Prince of Persia

Burnout Paradise

GT5: prologue

Resistance 1

Resistance 2

Killzone 2

Valkyria Chronicles

Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction

Fight Night Round 3

NBA 2K9

GTA4http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/post_msg.php?msg_id=317256729#317256729

Devil May Cry 4

Heavenly Sword

PES 2009

EDIT: How could i possibly forget aobut LBP, Batman AA and inFamous lol

.

.

and im planning to buy Dragon Age origins

Crack in time (sometime down the road. maybe next summer)

GoW Collection (bday gift from my sister :D)

Assassin's Creed 2 (still undecided cause first games was garbage)

GoW3

Heavy Rain

GT5

and yes, i don't have CoD4. and not getting Modern Warfare 2 or MAG.

roddollente

Dude! You owned me! On my own topic! Thats low.....lol j/k

Thanks Guys. By the end of next year I hope to add Assassins Creed 2, Bioshock 2, Final Fantasy 13. I never have time to play games thanks to college, but a month-long christmas says otherwise :)

I give it a 2/10Doolz2024

Ouch what do you think I should do to make it better?

Uncharted

Uncharted 2 (new)

Valkyria Chronicles

Resistance 2

Bioshock

Prince of Persia

Fallout 3 Game of the Year Edition (new)

Elder Scroll 4 Oblivion Game of the Year Edition

Assassins Creed (new)

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

(I come from egypt and have been to some arab countries. You don't know corruption till you've been there).

IbnLaAhad

You, my friend, don't know corruption. People from my country have assassinated each other, given bribes to no end, become corrupt to the point of insanity. Thankfully... most of it is over now.

Lol we are not that bad yet, but.....the Muslim Brotherhood is agitating. It appears, if they have their way, Egypt will end up a theorcracy like Iran. So while I'm pretty sure Egypt's outlook isn't as gloomy as your country's situation, its not all happy days. But yea, seems these third world countries just keep getting more and more insane as time goes by, or at least some of them.

US government. Not exactly the best, but I've seen much worse (I come from egypt and have been to some arab countries. You don't know corruption till you've been there). With all the fragility of coalition governments, oppression of single party states, and so on, I can't reallly complain. Well, I can, but I digress.....US gov gets a solid 8.0 out of 10 in my book

[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Here it is Lans.

LOLTRAIN

Thanks.

In answer to your questions:

1) Yes. Judaism was the first religion on earth.

2) That depends on whether you pin the origin of Judaism to Adam and Eve, or some time later, say with the Abrahamic Covenant or the giving of the Law to Moses. Personally, I would suggest that Judaism started with the covenant between Abraham and God and would thus say that marriage was already around before Judaism was.

3) As I think it's likely that it did not -- no.

He is right. Judaism isn't the first religion on earth. It is the first monotheistic one, however.

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

What if I say that an incestual relationship, or a pedophile with a child, has consent? What if the incestual relationship invovles two fully grown adults? Bestiality, and you are correct in this, is completely irrelvant to these two points. But when we say "love" is everything for marriage, who are we to say a man and his dog are not in love? It sounds disturbing, but thats how gay marriage has become accepted.

RiseAgainst12

So what if they have consent? An incestuous relationship can bear defective offspring so it is harmful to a child born from one. Pedophillia even if consentual, the child is not fully developed enough emotionally and physically to make such a descision which could be manipulated by the older of the 2. And thirdly Beastiality Cannot be consentual as Animals cannot communicate to us.

Now to compare those things to two men/women who both love each other and can voice there consentual love without outside influence is nothing like the latter 2 and can cause no harm to anyone like the first.

It is very disturbing how you can compare these to Homosexual relationships and leads me to believe you are very much ill informed about alot of things.

Read my previous post. I'm not some insane hater. I just am pointing out the insanity of what is considered normal these days. Its disturbing to you (my comparisons) because they do not resonate in your upbringing. You (like me) have seen homosexuals commonly and have accepted their presence as all else. When someone points out the inherit insanity of such acceptance, you (like me or anyone else) gets very defensive and appalled. Think forward. 100 years from now. There will be someone like you who says the same thing about some new social value. Detach yourself from the now. We all accept that homosexuals are people, and can be smart ones at that, but the integrity of actions do not depend on intelligency alone. Oh, and I have responded to each one of your posts in other responses.

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"]As i pointed out you compared gay marriage to the likes of Incest, human animal relations and Pediophillia.. that is a very outlandish claim to compare them and say each is not harmful to anyone else. 1. Incest is harmful to any child born from an incestuous relationship. 2. Human Animal relations have no consentual say from the animal. 3. Pedophillia... LOLWUT? happy now?Teenaged

What if I say that an incestual relationship, or a pedophile with a child, has consent? What if the incestual relationship invovles two fully grown adults? Bestiality, and you are correct in this, is completely irrelvant to these two points. But when we say "love" is everything for marriage, who are we to say a man and his dog are not in love? It sounds disturbing, but thats how gay marriage has become accepted.

But, gay marrige leads to no offspring....and a pedophile need not worry about defective offsprings.

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Ok first define "natural".

We must know what you define "natural" as before anyone can deploy a counterargument. Explain the terms you use please.

LOLTRAIN

We all know what natural function is. It is not subjective. A clock is naturally functioning properly if it tells time. Simple. Natural for a human is the uses the body is build for (this includes physcological development since infancy). There is a lot of subjective things out there, like morality, love, even beliefs to an extent, but the human body is not subjective. Biological foundations antedate even marriage. So if marriage cannot even conform to who we are, then what is its purpose? We need a stable enviornment in which two adults can depend on each other, and children are raised in this dependency. Natural. Gay marriage does not allow for this. I have went over the reasons a hundred times already. Read by earlier posts if you want to see what I think.

Very good point! But you forgot one simple fact: nature changes to confirm to fit best the environment in which the organism lies. Now, is there evolution today, with air planes to mix gene pools, medicine to prevent death at the proper time, and so on. Is there evolution today? Probably not, or so minute it is irrelevant. There is no need to say, at this time, or in the last thousands of years, that humans evolved to be homosexual. It makes no sense, andbecause of modern developments, it cannot be feasible in the future.

Guys, I want to make a point here before I go on. I don't hate homosexuals, I hate homosexuality. Although I have not met many homosexuals in line with my views, I have met a few who were intelligent, strong willed, and industrious. Homosexuals are not animals. THey are humans like you and me. But just because this is true does not mean we should accept what they are doing. In fact, the only thing I hate more than homosexuality is those who think its fair to call them"phags" or beat them or ostracise them from jobs and so forth. Lets be fair to all, but lets be true to our beliefs as well. Thats what I think