peter1191's forum posts

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

Lol how so? The only reason it is acceptable is the simple fact that society has lived with it, so our horror towards such behavior has diminished to acceptance. Really, there is no difference. All of it is unnatural. Most ppl use religious arguements to substantiate their views. Ok, I agree. But what about evolutionary agruements? Is it possible that humans would be sexually attracted to their own gender? Doesn't this inhibit reproduction? Isn't this a "flaw" of human nature, if it is innate (aka born w/homosexuality) rather than developed? Just some things to contemplate as society slips into ever increasing acceptance of insanity.

Dark_Knight6

If that's the case, aren't heterosexual couples who are unable to birth a child just as unnatural. And last I checked, they were allowed to marry one another.

Good your smart. I expected some sorry reply like: "we're all equal anyway, forget the logic, its love!" Heterosexual couples who can't give birth are nonetheless "natural" if we want to go down this Darwinistic route (which by the way I don't like to use, but I was just putting it out there for thought) because it is not that they lack the "tools" to create children, it is merely the fact their "tools" are unable to function. THey can still provide a natural home for the development of youth, who can grow up and be able to reproduce themselves. Homosexuals are not "impared," they are incompatible by nature (for making children). They do not provide the optimum enviornment for raising future generations (lack of male or female figure, depending on the case) if adoption was a sought after course. Biologically there is a great difference between imparity and incompatability. Now, I ask you: can we make such an arguement for father-daughters or mother-sons? No. THink about it. As our society accepts innuendos as "equal" these arguements will lose clout as the one I have posted above. DONT LET YOUR COMPLACENCY BE THE REASON FOR CASUAL INSANITY

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

[QUOTE="peter1191"]

Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?

PannicAtack

You're comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest, and pedophilia. That is idiotic.

Lol how so? The only reason it is acceptable is the simple fact that society has lived with it, so our horror towards such behavior has diminished to acceptance. Really, there is no difference. All of it is unnatural. Most ppl use religious arguements to substantiate their views. Ok, I agree. But what about evolutionary agruements? Is it possible that humans would be sexually attracted to their own gender? Doesn't this inhibit reproduction? Isn't this a "flaw" of human nature, if it is innate (aka born w/homosexuality) rather than developed? Just some things to contemplate as society slips into ever increasing acceptance of insanity.

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

Well, homosexuality is not natural (I don't see any study confirming this) so no. But heck, if we all wanna agree to something that supposedly doesn't hurt others, lets make it all legal: polygamy, father-daughter, mother-son relations, human-animal sexual interactions, and so on. Hey, they're not hurting anyone either, right?

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

I know they are not produced by nintendo anymore. Does any store near you perhaps recently sold or still has one? What stores have electronics and usually do not sell them (like walmart, since I don't think many ppl would buy games from there, but i haven't found a controller there). Where can I find one, basically speaking?

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

I've been waiting for 2 days

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

Why doesn't anyone want to answer any question about Prince of Persia anywhere????!!!!

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

The art gallery, which is suppose to unlock when you beat the game, is not unlocking. Admittedly, I went to the saves section of the PS3 and found two prince of persia files codenamed "profile" so I deleted one. I don't know if this had any affect. I also have the DLC, so has this affected the game at all for others like me who have purchased the DLC for this game?

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

My dad has had a Dell Inspiron that recently died, and I decided to become computer savvy (or to you guys, a complete noob) and open it up, learn the location of certain parts, and replace and fix what I can. One of these things is the harddrive that was hit by a virus and is now completely usless. I want to replace it, but I am not sure what harddrives are compatable, unless they all are or something (remember, I know nothing about this proceedure). I also want to upgrade the ram, buy a new battery, and a new graphic's card. Whats your advice, or am I missing something?

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts

No no no! Get the Fallout 3 Game of the Year Edition in october for the same price but nearly double the content with 5 dlcs !! Stick with GTA for now, although I think Fallout 3 is better. You'll get a far superior value for the game in a few months, so wait!

Avatar image for peter1191
peter1191

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 peter1191
Member since 2005 • 591 Posts
Thanks guys for the advice, both of you