I don't think so, but that's incredibly inconsiderate for them to disregard your health for the sake of their own addictions. I would talk to them about it, smoking indoors is a horrible thing to do in a house with non-smokers.
I dipped for about a month in high school, never bought my own tin though I always just bummed small pinches from people. It wasn't really my thing, and the ladies don't like a drooling, yellowed idiot so I quit while I was ahead. Most of my friends still do it though, i think they all like skoal straight.
I think hiding what you want to say is just as "real" as just saying it....it demonstrates that you fear the consequences of what you can say, which is still a "real" approach to life. So...er....yes and no.
Did anyone see the colbert report on this? "The other black people in the crowd had the decency to......be white." I'm no huge fan of his but that had me in tears
We hardly get them over here, and the ones we do get are just pamphlet givers, not the annoying talkers, so its not a big deal. Just take what they have and recycle it immediately after. I kinda wish i did get the annoying ones, i've got some really good ideas for how to mess with them
I pre-ordered the Limited edition and today I checked my recite and it turns out the guy accidentally put me down as a legendary, and they refuse to change it back. I have to pay for the legendary now because Reach is sold out( both limited and standard) at my gamestop. Kinda stupid if you ask me.
ujjval16
I don't know what comes in each edition (other than the regular one haha), but you could turn this into a good thing by selling whatever you don't want on eBay. I'm sure some desperate dude will buy whatever fancy thing comes with the Legendary edition for much more than it's worth.
Yeah, during ages 8-15 i played a ton of gameboy and xbox, but now i buy fewer games and play less often than i used to. Now i'm not bringing my 360 to college, so i doubt ill play much at all except for when i'm home on break catching up on titles i miss. (this year itll be halo reach, fable 3, and maybe Fallout NV)
Well that was quick.....Hopefully people don't latch onto the idea that he's a rapist and instead realize how incredibly odd it is that such a charge would appear out of nowhere without evidence and without even notifying the accused, and then suddenly be withdrawn. I'm not sure what to say about it being a conspiracy. I mean, it could've been, and it falls in line with the way the US govt has been targeting him. They want people to see him as a monster, an international enemy of any country with troops in iraq or afghanistan. They want people to fear him. Now all of a sudden he may or may not be a rapist. It doesn't matter that nothing came of it because the idea is there. This is taken from an article written by a Canadian doctor who supports Wikileaks, i think it makes a lot of sense.
"It would be amazing if the U.S. or an ally ever got to try a case against Wikileaks on the grounds that troops' lives had been endangered. It would be a massive fiasco. The state would need to show -- and not just assert, as it does now -- exactly how any troops were actually endangered. Which of the rounds received from small arms fire in Afghanistan is a regular "insurgent" round and which one is a Wikileaks-inspired round? In a war zone, how do you calibrate safety levels such that you can tell when, with Wikileaks, the danger meter went deeper into the red? And since Afghan civilians are already, all too painfully, aware of the damage done by U.S. and NATO forces, how can the release of these records do any greater damage? Did Afghans need a reminder, in print, in another language?
If the state fails to make any sense -- not surprising -- it is because it is has no intention of doing so. The state is appealing to something more visceral with all of this posturing: fear. It wants to strike fear into the minds and bodies of people working with Wikileaks, or anyone else doing such work, and anyone contemplating leaking any classified records. Fear is its greatest weapon of psychological destruction, with proven success at home. And in this case, the danger lies at home. The outcome the state hopes for is greater self-censorship and greater self-monitoring."Maximillian C Forte
Log in to comment